DArtagnan
|
20-7-2010 15:42 |
Reply #22 CunningLinguist's post
The underlying issue they're trying to avoid is a 3rd party benefiting financially from the prostitution.
The key point to understand is it's not the sex they're objecting to in brothels, nor group sex per se, but rather the element of one person controlling or influencing another to have sex. The goal is to eliminate any incentive to coerce girls to have more sex than they want, or for less money than they could get. It's explicitly illegal to introduce another person for paid sex (i.e. as a pimp).
As it happens even the landlords of 141 places are skating on thin ice ... they are after all profiting from prostitution ... but that seems to be handled as a grey area in the way the law is enforced. | |
All times are GMT+8, the time now is 25-11-2024 11:30
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.
