Are there patterns to when you post reviews?
There was a recent thread that raised the question of whether experiences with 141 girls are disproportionately better or worse in terms of performance than those with HG at twice the price. Opinion was mixed. In the discussion, one poster said that he would not be convinced (I don't remember of what) unless someone actually did a comparison of the reviews.
But are the reviews actually a decent sample? My conjecture is that posters do not file reviews randomly -- in other words, there are patterns. For example, I have noticed that there are very few reviews for 141 girls in some of the outlying areas. Nonetheless, whenever anyone asks about the action in any of these areas, a bunch of guys chime in with opinions. So either guys are making comments with no factual basis or they're not posting a lot of reviews.
In my own experience, i tend to post reviews when I have really good or bad experiences. For run-of-the-mill experiences, it's hard to work up the enthusiasm to post. I also post more when I have a session with a more expensive girl -- somehow I feel like the information is worth more. Do others have similar patterns?
P.S. My experiences this evening prompted this question. I spent the evening in CSW and SSPo sampling the local delicacies. I will report back when I have some time...
|