Sorry guys, actually I am not new here but I lost my old handle.

I am wondering if anyone else has had the same experience as mine lately. More of the pictures of the TST Hotel Reservation girls have a "Picture not from 141.com" message across the middle of the photo. It's like a disclaimer of proprietary responsibility. At this point I take it as an accurate warning not to trust the photo!

My experience of late has been that these girls look OUTSTANDING in the photos, but absolutely don't measure up in person. Face, skin and bodies all 3 points or more below the level of the photo. Definitely lower correspondence between the photo and reality than in the so-called normal photos that do not have this disclaimer on them.

My sample is based on 4 different girls and at this point I don't really want to try out more of them. Last night I was actually saved because I booked the girl (Jane -- TST Hotel Res) and went to the hotel. She seemingly reluctantly opened the door part-way. We looked at each other. She mumbled some Putonghua to say that she didn't want a gweilo and I was relieved because she bore little resemblace to the girl in the photo. Having said that, it was not a bait and switch ploy; she was "Jane" -- just didn't look like the photo.

I have been around this site long enough to understand the intricacies of photoshop, but IMHOP whoever is doing this number has gone too far. Moreover, as of the last couple of weeks, it seems like more and more of the Hotel Res girls seem to be coming through this particular "channel". I have actually felt a bit ripped off which has seldom been the case on this website which I consider the monger's best friend of anywhere in the world.

I raise this point here because I don't know any other way to give feedback to the website operators/pimps who are doing this particular hustle.

Your thoughts?

Hi TG

my own guess is that the big banner has to do with the site wanting to be arms-length in their relationship with the girls - so as not to be shut down for taking money from immoral earnings - nothing to do with quality as such.  

Some pics are accurate, some are blatantly wrong.  Sometimes it's a set of pics she took 2 years ago before she became old and fat, sometimes it's a completely different girl.  Occasionally the pics are 100% spot on, and every now and again a real gem: the pics are nowhere near as cute as the real thing.  

It goes with the territory.

Best way to counter it is with reporting.  Which is why some (a few) of us go to the trouble of sharing our experience here: it helps everyone, and the more people share, the fewer disappointments we all have.  

So ... please do share ... who did you visit, what did they look like - can you flesh out your report?  If you use the standard format, it helps a lot for others to understand your ratings.

BTW your posting was really a question not a report - I'm sure one of the mods will mention it shortly: please post questions in the Q&A section, and only put reports in the Reports section ... otherwise you make a lot of extra work for them to tidy up!

This post will be moved to Chat

ThaiGuy - what was your previous name in this forum ?

I believe the message inprinted in all the new pictures has nothing to do with if the picture
of the girl looks wise is accurate ... it is a disclaimer for the long arms of the law !

Any examples of this?  I've not noticed it before so it must be something they've started doing recently.

Here are 2 examples.

http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid. ... -1&keyword=erin

http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid. ... ype=-1&keyword=


weird. why not all of them have this. Only some of them.

Has anyone tried Erin or Lucy to confirm if their pics are accurate?  It would be interesting to know.

It's a recent development - couple of weeks.  

Can't say if all the new pics have it (not going to check!) but certainly seen it a lot recently.

All new pictures have this new disclaimer, the old ones still have the old disclaimer ...
but new or old I don't see the problem !