I see so many hot girls on the Girl DB section of this website.  In your guys experiences how many of these pictures are accurate?  I notice some have Videos too...

Got you some bad news bro. At least 70% of the photos are heavily edited or out right stolen on the internet or porn films. They're at best for reference only. Those with clear faces, expect they're heavily edited as well. When it's too good to be true, it is.

Rule of thumb, never step through the door until you see their face and body and have a clear picture of how much you're paying.

ok i was afraid of that,  but what about the videos?

You clearly are new to this game, you can always walk away without paying so long as you don't step through the door. You might get a few rant, few curses or door slam.

majority of the images are photoshoped or at the very least touched up or old pics from a few years ago.

there will be a few that won't be but don't hold high hopes.

what about the videos?  they can't fake those right

They often modify existing photos heavily to make them unrecognizable, makes sense. Otherwise someone would recognize them on the street.

fake or overly photoshopped pictures are just part of this game unfortunately. Even if a girl has 10+ authentic reviews I often find that her pictures dont reflect the reality accurately. I think the best medicine against fake images is
be willing to walk away. In the past I was just to nice (and / or horny) to go away when I met her to walk away or send her away. I would just stay and be disappointented afterwards. TThat was just stupid from me. Know your standards and have a plan in mind when she does not meet it.

Hi ch0wd0wn, I’ll only comment on the variability of photos/videos across Hotel Walk-Ins versus Walk-Ups. No experience with Spas/Phone Appointments.

With Hotel Walk-Ins/Honey girls, photos+video can be 100% authentic ... yet, many pimps Bait&Switch ... deliberately using outdated info to get unsuspecting punters to turn up at their hotels ... tempting them with alternative offers once on site.

With Walk-Ups, photos are likely an 80:20 rule ... out of 10 girls, 8 photoshop ... additionally, ladies aged mid 30s upwards tend to recycle backdated (much younger) photos. On a practical note ...
1. Profiles that have photos with a pink/red tint in their “My album”/“Fan’s comment” sections, especially within the setting of her room ... more accurately depicts her body dimensions versus studio photos with clear lighting.
2. Much fewer Walk-Ups with videos (than Hotel girls). Comparing a video against pink/red tinted pics is about as “reliable” a WYSIWYG gauge of her body ratios. Even in videos, plenty of apps to mask faces. Harder to alter limbs/torso/legs in videos.
3. No pink/red tinted pics &/or video? I’d pass on such a random pick & revisit candidates with 1, 2.

Just plan forward the logistics. About 75% of girls with videos are in TST, less so in MK/SSP. If u are shortlisting hotel girls based on their videos, as a back up, identify Walk-Ups that have pink/red tinted pics and/or videos in the same locations. No pimp/gangster will threaten yr choice to reject the girl/walk away.

Understand u are working towards an RA of 30 to view real photos in reports. Till then, unfortunately, there isn’t a more precise online method to verify the visuals prior to a visit.

You might get a few rant, few curses or door slam.This is the best way to deal with this situation，but I don't dare to do that.