Originally posted by rxr12 at 1-5-2009 04:29
Hahaha....I can only imagine the fall out from that naming convention. In today's PC world we live in, they won't even think about naming a pandemic after a nationality, ethnicity, race, color (wonder if they will change the names of yellow fever, bubonic plague at some point in the future) .. As a matter of fact, they are moving away from using Swine now and referring it by its technical name - H1N1 i- n the press conferences, media (Pigs' feelings are getting hurt I guess). Well, actually, some people are getting this idea that because the flu has swine associated with its name, it's caused by eating pork. And so you have countries like Egypt who have decided to slaughter approx 300,000 pigs. Go figure.
Yes, the Mexican government went ballistic when it was first referred to as Mexican Flu. After that the US started calling it H1N1, presumable to cut off objections from the US farm lobby about hurting the sales of pork products.
It's absolutely Mexico's fault, so it's seems fitting that it SHOULD be named for them. The US has enough issues with them allowing illegal aliens from Mexico (ALSO MISNAMED as "undocumented workers"!!!) into the US, it's 10 times worse now that these people will be sneaking in as potential disease carriers.
-G