This is a hard press morality stance.

For some, visiting WG also post some degree of moral issue, isn't it?

Now, I would absolutely think shoot of the sex scene between your girl friend or wife is questionable even with consent, because the record will last when relationship may not... so it will post some serious issue going forward for that relationship.

Now for WG, like I said before, if the person is really worry about their privacy, there is a really strong case to ensure some protection.   But today, with internet and porn sites and the enormous volume of so called girls photo, as long as the name of the girl and its pictures remain anonymous, it is less of an offense to not protect privacy.

I agree privacy is an issue of huge significance especially if you are some celebrity.   And practicing unconsent recording of the sex scene with a WG will post risk for both sides.

Isn't it risky of AIDs to have sex with a WG?

Happppy, we can debate till the moon turns blue and we wouldn't come to a consensus ...

you have your opinions and I have mine, there's no right or wrong ... just different standards and different ethics.

but what does aids & WGs have to do with this ????

Sorry Twice, no offense.

Just want to assert that you are right, but my thought process also struggle towards what you call as "Ethics"... I wonder on that myself all the times too and I can't sometimes see it clear.   Privacy, ethics, risk are issue surrounding this hidden camera discussion.

I read some articles in the Canadian Broad in both Merb, and Terb about this issue as well.

I don't mean to disrespect you, I just want to air my view of the two sides of my conscience that I know of the ethical problem yet sometimes it excites me so much that I could not help to stop... to the extend that filming the sex with the WG becomes so excessive I did not enjoy the sex but the capture of the moment... is there something wrong with me?

No offence and no disrespect taken ! ... I was also just venting ny opinion ...

Just like a lot of things in life, ethics is subjective ... means different things to different people ....

Yeah, I noticed in your writing you seem to enjoy the recording of the deed a bit more !
excessive compulsive ? ... but its in all of us - on different things, some more, some less !    

You the man and thanks for the understanding.

Sometimes, I am trying hard to discourage other bro here whenever they come either in the open or privately to ask me aboutthe technique on the capture.  But I also found it exciting to want to share, especially when some other brother come back toshow me what they capture in their past... it is like an addiction... the more you saw those capture the more you want to do it your own.

That is why I felt like when I have the full consent, it was so precious... because it was like the dream come true, I can enjoy the sex and then enjoy the memory all at the same time....

Somehow, the ability to record also affect the type of girl I tend to enjoy, long legs, slim, tall, fashion model type before precisely those feature stands out in the pic and video... I watch the fashion model on their runway and can't help dreaming of their naked body in bed, the same way the captures are...

Compulsive is always excessive.  I have been doing this mongering for a limited time in my life knowing that I would have problem trying to control my compulsive behavior to want more....

At this point, I am finding it harder and harder to find gigs to excite me... After photo shoot and fuck... I am not sure what will be more interesting...

Having a girl film you, perhaps? (for her own keeping)
Or maybe doing it in places where you know there are security cameras on you?

then post it up to the website for viewers to give ratings.


Or fcuk in the public......provided it is lawful..

I've got a bit of experience with the whole pictures/video thing, and I'd have say that taking pictures of WGs to document then is cool, but sex shot and videos are something I think best saved for someone you have at least a casual relationship with. It actually takes a bit of practice and patients to hold a video camera while having sex, and after you've done it you'll be surprises at how often you really need to use both hands while you're going at it. You'll loose your balance and fall on her a few times before you get the hang of it, and you'll find that it's a pain in the ass to get the lighting right. I challenge you to get through a whole session without a shadow of your arm holding the camera on the girls belly or back!

As for equipment, you'll never be happy with one of the flip cameras. it doesn't have a wide enough lens and can't handle low light. As a test you might want to try making a video using "movie" mode on a compact still camera. If you're on top you'll find it hard to get the whole girl in the frame even with the camera zoomed all the way out. You'll want a full digital camera with a threaded lens that records to flash memory (the hard drive ones aren't shockproof) and is good with low light. You'll also want a 0.5x wide angle lens adapter to help with the "wide angle" problem you'll have trying to get a girl that's ummm, attached to you completely into the frame. Canon, Panasonic, and now JVC have models that will do. Maybe the new Sanyo ones would be OK as well and a bit less expensive.

Twice is completely right about the consent thing. it's just uncool to video anyone without their permission, and you'll find that in the end it's more trouble than its worth. Morality aside you'll get yourself banned and blacklisted pretty fast if you don't follow the golden rule and "do unto others", etc. Even if you don't have a shred of decency yourself, the rest of us do and we'll enforce this.


don't publish the nude photos, don't release the sex videos. you don't want the hassle and certainly don't want to cause the WGs that operate in our sandbox any heartache or grief.

-G

So what did you use for those great pictures you've posting? digital video camera? compact camera? or phone camera?

Sony DSC-W300. I answered this question in another thread somewhere but can't find it now. Basically you just want a still camera that had both optical and digital image stabilization. I picked this camera for it's good indoor shots and low light handling.

-G

I believe there are full-hd video cameras which have optical zoom now.
Sanyo-VPC-FH1
Sanyo-VPC-HD2000

I have used Sanyo-vpc-hd1 since 2006 with 1080i...

And these Sanyo HD camcorder are now nth generation... with amazing quality 1080p pic.

Here is one example of my 2006 shot of Model Julia in Toronto and it is still good with the old technology...

you're tempting me to pick up the new videocam for my upcoming trip

the zoom isn't the issue, it's the wide angle. when was the last time you tried filming a sex scene that you were in from 25m away? you'll need a wide angle converter (like this) to get the close in shots.

i saw these cameras recently but didn't have a chance to try them out. my first thought is that they would do well for what we're talking about using them for.

-G

wide angle lens? too bad ....  don't think i can indulge in the latest full hd camcorder with additional wide angle lens anyway. No budget

Flip miniHD US $210 vs Kodak Zi6 US $150

Both High Definition in 720P.... downside is weak in indoor dim light situation.

Thanks for the info! Will look into those models.

how much extra dough do you actually give the girls for those video-taking/photo-taking sessions happy?

For a quick snapshot or two, none. For a full on video, you'll have to negotiate, but I wouldn't offer more than her "normal" hourly rate as a bonus. For a photo shoot, I'd say somewhere in between.

With that said, I don't bother trying to make videos with WGs, you should save that for girlfriends or at least WGs that you know well and have some sort of "relationship" with.

-G