‹‹ Last Thread | Next Thread ››  24  2/2 ‹‹12

Poll Trade Reward Activity

orsum Lustful Lord UID 32465 Digest Posts 0 Credits 664 Posts 213 Karma 656 Acceptance 160 Reading Access 40 Registered 10-10-2009 Status Offline

#21 Post at 6-7-2010 21:39  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L I went to the library and looked up the Archbold, which is like the bible for criminal lawyers in Hong Kong (and costs HK$5,500), and there is no such defence. This defence is also contrary to well accepted common law defences such as provocation and insanity, so this is a hoax. Bros - you don't have to worry that your wives can legally kill you. However, most people that envinces an intention to kill don't care whether the killing is legal or not, so nothing stops your wife from killing you and your lover illegally.

geoduck Godfather of Hole UID 41248 Digest Posts 0 Credits 7512 Posts 3232 Karma 7419 Acceptance 1854 Reading Access 90 Registered 12-3-2010 Status Offline

#22 Post at 6-7-2010 21:56  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Don't think this law applies in HK as it would have been tested in court in the many instances when a wife murdered her husband. Take the Nancy Kissel case of 2003 who murdered her husband. She was sentenced to life imprisonment for drugging her husband and then bludgeoning him to death. He was known to be a womanizer as well but this was never used as evidence. Nancy is a real bad ass but the case may be retried later this year on other grounds.

flinger Lustful Lord UID 4610 Digest Posts 0 Credits 715 Posts 573 Karma 712 Acceptance 63 Reading Access 40 Registered 17-11-2007 Location Canada Status Offline

#23 Post at 6-7-2010 22:45  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Ok so if I were to call on the mythbusters, this would be busted!

geoduck Godfather of Hole UID 41248 Digest Posts 0 Credits 7512 Posts 3232 Karma 7419 Acceptance 1854 Reading Access 90 Registered 12-3-2010 Status Offline

#24 Post at 6-7-2010 22:57  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L QUOTE: Originally posted by geoduck at 6-7-2010 21:56 Nancy is a real bad ass but the case may be retried later this year on other grounds.... Oh, BTW, for those of you out there that think I may be wrong in judging Nancy as a bad ass, believe me she is. All along she's been playing the innocent victimized little housewife in court but in reality she has tats all over her back and her chest. She's definitely not a good, innocent mother brought to the brink of despair like her lawyers portrayed her to be.  Attachment: Your usergroup does not have permission to access attachments

24  2/2 ‹‹12

Poll Trade Reward Activity

All times are GMT+8, the time now is 29-11-2024 08:19

Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.