Weelock
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 69
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4376
Posts 2584
Karma 4304
Acceptance 1435
Reading Access 70
Registered 19-2-2007
Location Mars Colony, Mongo City
Status Offline
Post at 16-5-2010 07:00  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by darmour88 at 16-5-2010 05:49
I dont think it's that outrageous. If the girls are in the database, that probably means someone at least semi pro shot the pictures. I can't imagine them using a point and click (although who knows). ...

if you look at the meta data, sometimes you will see what was used to take the pictures.

I have old pictures taken in 2008. They used Photoshop CS2, Canon PowerShot G6, Canon PowerShot G5, Sony DSLR-A350, and Sony DSLR-A100. I have might missed a few.

For a picture taken late 2009, they used a Canon EOS 50D and Canon EOS 40D.

I know the G5 and G6 are ponit and shoot pocket size cameras.

[ Last edited by  Weelock at 16-5-2010 09:57 ]
Top
pandaboy
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4



UID 4884
Digest Posts 0
Credits 681
Posts 408
Karma 672
Acceptance 189
Reading Access 40
Registered 21-11-2007
Status Offline
Post at 16-5-2010 08:10  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I just use my iphone!!!  Hey, one time I was taking pictures of a girl, and she said she wanted to take pictures of me.  Weird?
Top
2dime
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1



UID 32498
Digest Posts 0
Credits 8
Posts 9
Karma 8
Acceptance 0
Reading Access 10
Registered 11-10-2009
Status Offline
Post at 16-5-2010 11:11  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
sony has their NEX series coming out. they seem pretty good and convenient to carry around.
http://dpreview.com/previews/sonynex5/
it seems to be worth the wait.
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 17-5-2010 19:18  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I use an old Canon EOS 30D. It's getting long in the tooth but still takes decent pics. I will probably hold on to the body as I'm waiting for the new 5D Mark III.

I pair it with a EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f/4-5.6 lens. These are the pics I took today with it:
http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... &extra=page%3D1

I'm not too happy with the low light performance of the lens and decided to splurge on a EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens today. Took some test shots and they perform much better in low light. I will take more pics tomorrow and share my results.

I use my iPhone as backup but I don't like the quality of the pics.

Recent Ratings
Weelock   18-5-2010 02:27  Karma  +1   little short for the report but OK.Would
Weelock   18-5-2010 02:27  Acceptance  +1   little short for the report but OK.Would
Top
JckJr
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 24334
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3736
Posts 2336
Karma 3693
Acceptance 866
Reading Access 70
Registered 2-5-2009
Location too far away
Status Offline
Post at 17-5-2010 20:11  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #24 buaku's post

Those are great shots! I suppose one cant go wrong with Wet Wet as a model but you've got some good shots and poses in there
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 18-5-2010 00:27  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Regarding comments that a large camera may scare the girls. I find that to be the opposite. They know a large camera i.e. DSLR will take better quality photos and in my experience they are more willing to let you take pictures and will pose. Most girls don't mind their pictures taken but they don't like poorly quality pictures that show them in bad light.
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 03:18  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #24 buaku's post

Here are pics taken with my new EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens. I adjusted the ISO to 400 & 800 and kept the aperture at f/2.8. I would have had to use the flash with my old lens and that would have washed out the colours.

http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... =page%3D1#pid237625

Recent Ratings
Weelock   20-5-2010 05:00  Karma  +1   Nice pict EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens
Weelock   20-5-2010 05:00  Acceptance  +1   Nice pict EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens
Top
Weelock
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 69
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4376
Posts 2584
Karma 4304
Acceptance 1435
Reading Access 70
Registered 19-2-2007
Location Mars Colony, Mongo City
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 05:12  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by buaku at 20-5-2010 03:18
Here are pics taken with my new EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens. I adjusted the ISO to 400 & 800 and kept the aperture at f/2.8. I would have had to use the flash with my old lens and that would have wash ...

For the EF 17-55 mm f/2.8 are you saying you did NOT used a flash ??


It looks like your EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f/4-5.6 lens pictures are better than the 17-55mm.  Maybe it's because you used the flash.


I pair it with a EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f/4-5.6 lens. These are the pics I took today with it:
Pictures of Wet Wet. I believe with a flash.

http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... &extra=page%3D1

[ Last edited by  Weelock at 20-5-2010 05:20 ]
Top
psy17
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1



UID 45184
Digest Posts 0
Credits 9
Posts 10
Karma 9
Acceptance 2
Reading Access 10
Registered 19-5-2010
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 06:46  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Love my Canon EOS 5D Mark II, awesome quality photos. It even does videos as good as a pro HD video camera. As proof just watch this season's finale of House, it was entirely shot with it.
Top
atomic3d
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 41127
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3282
Posts 2642
Karma 3157
Acceptance 2501
Reading Access 70
Registered 10-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 07:36  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #29 psy17's post

It is a beautiful camera, but I'm thinking maybe a bit bulky for those intimate WG shots.


 Attachment: Your usergroup does not have permission to access attachments
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 08:44  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by Weelock at 20-5-2010 05:12



For the EF 17-55 mm f/2.8 are you saying you did NOT used a flash ??


It looks like your EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f/4-5.6 lens pictures are better than the 17-55mm.  Maybe it's because you used the fla ...

I did not use flash for both sets of pictures. I prefer using available surrounding light. For WW, I opened the curtains and to let in natural sunlight and I am able to use ISO100. I couldn't do that for GG as it was pissing down with rain yesterday and there wasn't much light. I had to make the most of the available light in the room.
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 08:45  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #29 psy17's post

I really like the 5D Mark II as well and was close to buying it but I decided to wait for a newer version of it (rumoured 5D Mark III).
Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 09:13  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #28 Weelock's post

You can push the ISO to 1000 on the Lumix GF1 to shoot in low light and still get good pictures. Beyond ISO 1000 the graininess starts to show. The size of the camera and the fact you can push the ISO to extreme levels without much deterioration was what sold me on the GF1.
Top
Weelock
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 69
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4376
Posts 2584
Karma 4304
Acceptance 1435
Reading Access 70
Registered 19-2-2007
Location Mars Colony, Mongo City
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 10:44  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by buaku at 18-5-2010 00:27
Regarding comments that a large camera may scare the girls. I find that to be the opposite. They know a large camera i.e. DSLR will take better quality photos and in my experience they are more willin ...

Yes, the quality is way better than a pocket camera.  Have you taken and carried your camera on long vacations ? I had a 35 MM SLR about 15 years and it was a pain carrying it around on my neck. I constantly had to worry about it. I also had other things to carry and worry, my luggage. Now you add a small laptop computer with my travels. That is why I'm looking at micro 4/3 and what's coming out for Canon G12, Canon PRO 2 and LX 4/5 for this summer.  There is going to be some fierce competition.  There are rumors of new product ( camera ) from Canon and other manufactures.

[ Last edited by  Weelock at 20-5-2010 12:54 ]
Top
buaku
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 29397
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2094
Posts 414
Karma 2067
Acceptance 537
Reading Access 60
Registered 16-8-2009
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 20-5-2010 14:16  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by Weelock at 20-5-2010 10:44


Yes, the quality is way better than a pocket camera.  Have you taken and carried your camera on long vacations ? I had a 35 MM SLR about 15 years and it was a pain carrying it around on my neck. I c ...

I sometimes wish for a good prosumer camera but I love using my DSLR. I carry it for holidays in a Lowepro case called toploader with a telephoto lens attached to it's side. I like the toploader as I can sling it over my shoulder. It has a large front pocket that I keep my travel docs. I don't carry any other hand luggage as I like to travel as light as possible. The toploader provides easy access to the camera. Another plus point for the toploader is that it comes with a harness that lets you carry the case on your chest. Great for bringing your camera along when you ski.

http://products.lowepro.com/product/Topload-Zoom-AW,2053,8.htm

I have a large Lowepro backpack but I hardly use it due to it's bulkiness. There's a bunch of newer smaller backpacks that are great for travel. Some even have compartments for both a camera and notebook. Check them out as they will save your neck from getting bent out of shape.

[ Last edited by  buaku at 20-5-2010 14:17 ]
Top
di3selz
Musky Member
Rank: 2



UID 60637
Digest Posts 0
Credits 123
Posts 123
Karma 123
Acceptance 5
Reading Access 20
Registered 15-2-2011
Status Offline
Post at 26-2-2011 15:56  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I was wondering would it be too much to bring a DSLR to take pic of the WG??
Top
Weelock
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 69
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4376
Posts 2584
Karma 4304
Acceptance 1435
Reading Access 70
Registered 19-2-2007
Location Mars Colony, Mongo City
Status Offline
Post at 26-2-2011 16:53  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by di3selz at 26-2-2011 15:56
I was wondering would it be too much to bring a DSLR to take pic of the WG??

Wow, this thread is about 9 months old. There has been a few other threads on taking pictures of girls and buying cameras. I would say it depends on the girl.  If the girl refuse 100% and say NO NO, don't push the issue.

In Hong Kong was told it could be the opposite because the girl wants to promote herself more.  In this case she wants pictures and want a good report from you.   

I would be concern about flashing your expensive large camera around. Places involves working girl often attract some shady people.  

I had a DLR 35 film camera before. I had two lens. It was too big and clumsy carrying it around.  I worried about my camera constantly traveling.  Now I prefer something small, I don't care as much, take good pictures, with a large sensor, and fast lens. I was thinking about the Panasonic GF2 but it was too expensive for me. I ended up picking up a high end compact camera this XMAS.

Edit: better wording

[ Last edited by  Weelock at 28-2-2011 03:28 ]
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 22-9-2024 19:38

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.038709 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141LOVE.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141LOVE.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141LOVE.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141LOVE.COM reserves all the legal rights.