Originally posted by Marsupial at 20/2/08 00:20
but surely you don't think that slum dwellers should be envied their blissful lives?!...
Of course I don't think they should be envied, but neither do I think they should be pitied - I'm sure they don't pity themselves.
And I've never described their lives as blissful - why would I? But, equally, who are you to describe their lives as wretched, as in:
The wretchedness of life in the vast slums of Rio is infamous!...
Life in some middle class English suburbs is infamous for being so monumentally boring that it's no surprise that they can't survive
without their daily dose of Prozac. I can imagine small-town America being the same. But why should I pity them? Does anyone
really believe that the middle classes are happier than the working classes, simply because they have more money? Which do you
prefer, the sedate atmosphere of a middle-class wine bar or the more raucous bar or pub. It's a hypothetical question - the point
is, whichever one you prefer, don't automatically assume that one is better or more fun than the other.
I've never understood people who are so arrogant that they think their lives are so much better than anyone else'. And isn't
America the worst for this? Many Americans just can't undertstand why every other country don't want to be just like them.
How many of us are old enough to remember the Rock 'n' Roll mantra of the 60s and 70s - 'Live Fast, Die Young'. Now it seems
like everybody wants to live forever. As I've said before, elsewhere in this forum, I've always been drawn to the dark side, to the
fringes of acceptable society, to the desperados. Maybe these people don't live perfect, idyllic lives - but at least their lives are
not boring.
The web is full of articles about the health problems, sub-standard schooling, unemployment,
drug addiction and despair of the poor in Rio's slums....
Don't you see the irony in that? We're supposed to learn about the slums of Rio by reading articles on the web? In the 1950s in
England, the government demolished most of the slums and put people in brand spanking new high-rise blocks of flats. Touble is,
entire communities were destroyed and it wasn't long before the flats became the new slums and life was 100 times worse than
it had ever been in the previous so-called slums. I admire do-gooders but, a lot of the time, they do more harm than good.