Poll Subject: Skin or no skin  single choice
Voters for this poll:

CunningLinguist   hamsupgwai   nedword   zilla   jgaw88   peterlorre   Jake   MasterBlaster1   hunter   Marsupial   MaxY   swan   junglefever   parker   kaka   tierdhand   BOHRAT   jd888   PopTheBallons   mauvanilla   princeandnpg   Asslover   sexpert   norsecode   chelu   tonto1509   wackojacko   alex67   Kennichi   Frunkus   ouroboros   5-htp   robo   bmberman   irishdude012345   cantgetenough   goodjob   captaincaveman   mike999   Froddo   rimsky   LEGION   DArtagnan   John2   Lenny   advancivic5050   lbsand   pudendal   bbbjp   apex120HK   spikeyone   simplytheguest   dino   applejax   akka   dino2   HornyOldMan   la86561   schlong   zulu   bullworker   SEAJ   ultratoad   chimaira   Mister   lovmore   mikeo90   Xcor   thebigz0   forever69   tdogdog   netfreak2k11   JJJ37   disktroyer   plonkey   troyman2011   jcdenton   aussietimclark   spinaclez   bigbobbywong  
No
  49 (61.25%)
Yes
  31 (38.75%)


twiceAweek
Sex God
Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


UID 1044
Digest Posts 0
Credits 21117
Posts 20505
Karma 20541
Acceptance 11525
Reading Access 110
Registered 12-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 4-8-2008 15:41  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Skin or no skin

Are you circumcized ?

[ Last edited by  twiceAweek at 6-8-2008 08:01 ]
Top
LEGION
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1


UID 12772
Digest Posts 0
Credits 85
Posts 73
Karma 85
Acceptance 2
Reading Access 10
Registered 4-7-2008
Status Offline
Post at 4-8-2008 18:13  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Yes. Although, being circumcised is not the usual case in my country.
I had to go circumcised because of medical issues, my foreskin was way too small so it really hurt.
Now that I am, I would not want to go back. I think girls generally prefer a circumcised dick, they are way easier to clean - or to put it this way: No smegma ftw. Still having a feeling but enduring much longer during sex is a plus as well.
And, as you may have heard, being circumcised actually can help reducing the risk of getting aids by, I think, 70%.
Now whenever I see a not circumcised dick in some porn movie, it's going to be deleted immediately, it just doesn't look good. I'd say I am disgusted by the look of an uncircumcised dick. No offense.
Top
parker
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 4447
Digest Posts 0
Credits 206
Posts 142
Karma 205
Acceptance 16
Reading Access 30
Registered 15-11-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 00:46  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
have any bros had the snip as an adult? that is, have they had sex with and without and can make an objective comparison?
Top
wackojacko
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 8852
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4016
Posts 3165
Karma 4010
Acceptance 111
Reading Access 70
Registered 27-2-2008
Location Depends where I wake up!
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 05:53  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 twiceAweek's post

Twice, you have confused me with your question.  Skin or no skin?  No skin being circumcised would lead me to hit the "No" button for no skin. However in your first post you ask the question of "Are you circumcised" which would evoke an answer of YES if I was.  

Please clarify - I can't be both at the same time!  
Top
Jake (The Snake: King of 141)
Master Mongerer
Rank: 8Rank: 8


UID 2553
Digest Posts 0
Credits 5607
Posts 3938
Karma 5594
Acceptance 259
Reading Access 80
Registered 20-7-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 09:56  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #3 parker's post

Yeah, I noticed that. But the Poll Subject is 'skin or no skin'. So I've assumed a no means no skin.




Live Life With Passion
Top
Jake (The Snake: King of 141)
Master Mongerer
Rank: 8Rank: 8


UID 2553
Digest Posts 0
Credits 5607
Posts 3938
Karma 5594
Acceptance 259
Reading Access 80
Registered 20-7-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:08  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #3 parker's post

I was circumcised in my mid-30s. Much better before circumcision - more sensitive - a lot more sensitive.
My dickhead was protected at all times by the foreskin and only came out to play. Man. it was so pink and
moist, almost virginal in its beauty and purity.    Now it's gnarled and haggard - like the rest of me.




Live Life With Passion
Top
twiceAweek
Sex God
Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


UID 1044
Digest Posts 0
Credits 21117
Posts 20505
Karma 20541
Acceptance 11525
Reading Access 110
Registered 12-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:11  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Sorry for the confusion ....

The question is :   Are you circumcized ?

I think I've fuked up this poll ...

[ Last edited by  twiceAweek at 5-8-2008 10:15 ]
Top
twiceAweek
Sex God
Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


UID 1044
Digest Posts 0
Credits 21117
Posts 20505
Karma 20541
Acceptance 11525
Reading Access 110
Registered 12-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:14  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #6 Jake's post

Good point !

actualluy I was wondering if circumcised pricks are less sensitive ...

Recent Ratings
SEAJ   9-12-2010 13:59  Acceptance  +1   Thus revealing thineself! LOL!
Top
hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .)
Fucking Legend
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


UID 2748
Digest Posts 0
Credits 16230
Posts 12435
Karma 16060
Acceptance 3408
Reading Access 100
Registered 5-8-2007
Location Pussy Paradise, Earth
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:18  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #8 twiceAweek's post

Twice,

There was a thread discussed earlier.

Some bros had experience both skin and no skin.

It was interesting......

Iniitally circumcised dick will be very sensitive and after a all become less sentitive b'cos too much exposure and gettin use to it......somethin like that.....cannot remembr.




Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Top
hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .)
Fucking Legend
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


UID 2748
Digest Posts 0
Credits 16230
Posts 12435
Karma 16060
Acceptance 3408
Reading Access 100
Registered 5-8-2007
Location Pussy Paradise, Earth
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:22  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Old threads:

The usual professors discussion.....
http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... ighlight=circumcise

Again by Jack Daniels......so I guess now Jack need not go to Hospital for circumcision.
http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... ighlight=circumcise




Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Top
wackojacko
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 8852
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4016
Posts 3165
Karma 4010
Acceptance 111
Reading Access 70
Registered 27-2-2008
Location Depends where I wake up!
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:37  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #10 hunter's post

Hunter, you are indeed a legend!  Thanks for the links.  
Top
MasterBlaster1
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 2661
Digest Posts 0
Credits 613
Posts 285
Karma 610
Acceptance 52
Reading Access 40
Registered 30-7-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 10:52  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
QUOTE And, as you may have heard, being circumcised actually can help reducing the risk of getting aids by, I think, 70%. UNQUOTE

Is it that much 70%??  I had heard about this study before, but I had no idea the risk factor is reduced by so much.
Top
wackojacko
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 8852
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4016
Posts 3165
Karma 4010
Acceptance 111
Reading Access 70
Registered 27-2-2008
Location Depends where I wake up!
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 11:15  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #12 MasterBlaster1's post

Master, where did you get the quote from?
Top
twiceAweek
Sex God
Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


UID 1044
Digest Posts 0
Credits 21117
Posts 20505
Karma 20541
Acceptance 11525
Reading Access 110
Registered 12-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 11:39  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #10 hunter's post

  thanks !

MB1 - reduce the possibility of HIV/AIDS by 70% ?  I'm going to read up on this !!!
I thought all transmission were through body fluids so skin or no skin wouldn't make any difference.
Top
hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .)
Fucking Legend
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


UID 2748
Digest Posts 0
Credits 16230
Posts 12435
Karma 16060
Acceptance 3408
Reading Access 100
Registered 5-8-2007
Location Pussy Paradise, Earth
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 11:46  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #14 twiceAweek's post

I read somewhere that the lower risk (not sure that high of 70%) is because uncircumcised skin had the skin moving up and down. So when we pull out the Dom after the deed, there is a risk that some of the fluid from the gal vagina still fresh all over the lower part of the skin being move up towards the Dick head and mix up with ur semen......

Be careful when letting the gal taking off the condom for you. They use the same tissue to wipe / pull the condom off and then wipe ur dick head.....stupid!!!!! I always stop them and ask for new tissues........just watch out.....they dun care bout your dick/hygiene after you finish your dick.
Best, do it yourself....  



Another fact.....circumcision also reduce STD. Hit me if I am wrong.......




Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Top
MasterBlaster1
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 2661
Digest Posts 0
Credits 613
Posts 285
Karma 610
Acceptance 52
Reading Access 40
Registered 30-7-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 13:08  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #15 hunter's post

Wacko, I am referring to Legion's post up there....#2

I have read that indeed men who are uncut are higher risk because the foreskin can develop micro-tears quite easily, and that the foreskin is sometimes not clean and uncut men who have ulceration on the foreskin are at very high risk for female-to-male transmission.  That's why in certain places (Africa, India, China, Thailand) where circumcision is not the norm, the female-to-male transmission rate is much higher.

Maybe the report is wrong, but that's what I read...but I was surprised to see that (if its true) the risk is 70% less for circumcised men.

[ Last edited by  MasterBlaster1 at 5-8-2008 13:16 ]
Top
wackojacko
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 8852
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4016
Posts 3165
Karma 4010
Acceptance 111
Reading Access 70
Registered 27-2-2008
Location Depends where I wake up!
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 13:29  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #16 MasterBlaster1's post

70% is a huge statistic.  I'm with twice regarding the transmission of the virus.  I thought that its transmission was through exchange of fluids or through open wounds / cuts.  I would like to know where the figure of 70% comes from.
Top
MasterBlaster1
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 2661
Digest Posts 0
Credits 613
Posts 285
Karma 610
Acceptance 52
Reading Access 40
Registered 30-7-2007
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 14:27  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #17 wackojacko's post

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm

Interesting article about it here.  The average % of reduced risk, according to the 3 studies conducted in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda, is 63%.
Top
wackojacko
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 8852
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4016
Posts 3165
Karma 4010
Acceptance 111
Reading Access 70
Registered 27-2-2008
Location Depends where I wake up!
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 14:32  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #18 MasterBlaster1's post

Thanks for the link and the info.  Interesting results - I guess even less chance of transmission when a party hat is used - then it doesn't matter if you are circumcised or not!  
Top
LEGION
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1


UID 12772
Digest Posts 0
Credits 85
Posts 73
Karma 85
Acceptance 2
Reading Access 10
Registered 4-7-2008
Status Offline
Post at 5-8-2008 14:55  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Yep, sorry I didn't provide a source for my claim. However, seeing that it's around 63%, hey, that's almost 70 isn't it.
And for the reasons: The foreskin tends to have little wounds when engaging in sex and through those wounds you can get infected. Cutting the foreskin results in a smaller chance to actually get it.
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 11-11-2024 01:26

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.037589 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.