The only thing that helps me to accept racist posts like this is that the arguments are always so funny to read.
When people use arguments like this they actually make people disagree with them, however right or wrong the OP may be.
If he had written an intelligent argument about how it is a shame that so many poor women are pushed into prostitution by economics, many would understand (although you're already fighting a losing battle on a WG forum)...
...but when you use phrases such as "our women", and "delay no more" (I prefer my spelling), and comparing the situation to Nanjing, then you are not going to win the debate. It just makes you sound like an uneducated fool.
What the hell does "our women" mean anyway? The last time I checked "our women" in HK were ultra-skinny, dressed-like-Janice-Man-with-a-cap-balanced-on-her-head, Gucci-belt-wearing "Kong Nui". I don't think you need to be worried about "Our Women".
Although, last time I checked you said that you were ABC... so maybe you should stick to "Your Women" in the USA and leave "Our Women" in Asia alone. I mean, are you claiming this entire population based on racial or geographical criteria?
Maybe you are concerned about "Their Women", the women from mainland China who come to HK for a decent income that "Their men" don't give them back home (sad but true). Maybe you mean "Their Women" who come from Japan (allegedly), Korea, Taiwan, Philipines, hell, even Africa and Russia to Hong Kong to make money from Hong Kong men.
Yes, you can argue that prostitution is wrong... but please don't start making this about "us" and "them", because you will get completely flamed
[
Last edited by princeandnpg at 19-7-2009 21:26 ]