zeroz
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4



UID 3388
Digest Posts 0
Credits 761
Posts 552
Karma 744
Acceptance 336
Reading Access 40
Registered 27-9-2007
Status Offline
Post at 21-3-2017 12:08  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
0.01 condoms

So I've been using Sagami 0.02 for a while which I love and all the girls like it as well.. Tried their 0.01 before, but found them a bit too tight on me.. I noticed that Okamoto has a 0.01 now.. Has anyone tried both brands and compared the 2?

One other plus for Sagami is the unique condom packaging, which all the girls are curious about and is a nice talking point as well...

Recent Ratings
batman108   20-6-2017 01:35  Acceptance  +5   awesome and thanks
stinkyfeet   21-3-2017 13:18  Acceptance  +4   I wish they sell'm for .99 each
Top
aurufc
Forum Moderator
Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15



UID 111346
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3187
Posts 408
Karma 3081
Acceptance 2126
Reading Access 150
Registered 11-11-2013
Status Offline
Post at 30-4-2017 11:59  Profile Blog P.M. 
Font size: S M L
The Sagami 002 come in 2 sizes, Standard and Large (with a big green L on the box) but their 001 is just the Standard size.  Standard is too tight for me and L is just a bit bigger and longer (believe me its not a European/US L size) but nice fit and still gripping welll.

Have tried the Okamoto 001 and its a better fit than the Sagami standard size but still a bit tight.

ps agree with your comments of Sagami packaging - civies and WGs both are intrigued by it the 1st time lol!!!
Top
tierdhand
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 4504
Digest Posts 0
Credits 254
Posts 73
Karma 250
Acceptance 82
Reading Access 30
Registered 15-11-2007
Status Offline
Post at 3-6-2017 18:56  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #2 aurufc's post

Fanda in Central has the large size.  The standard size is even tight for us Asians.  I think they were $78 for a box of 3.
Top
hebe
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1



UID 127055
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7
Posts 10
Karma 7
Acceptance 3
Reading Access 10
Registered 4-3-2015
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2017 06:16  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Been alwiz using sagami001 ever since discovered it in tokyo.. ya i think the standard is fitted fr asians.. but its still the best rubber so far
Top
rubmeinatub
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 200342
Digest Posts 0
Credits 370
Posts 55
Karma 349
Acceptance 426
Reading Access 30
Registered 6-6-2017
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2017 13:06  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Aoni is other brand. 4 Normal size versions + 1 XL version.


As another option, AONI is a 001 brand that has an XL size. It's called: XL Ultrathin 001.
Compared to Sagami 001, both for me and the feedback from the ladies, is that Aoni 001 has a more silky sensation.
I found Sagami 001 a bit dry (inside that is), unless I applied a bit of lube to the inner tip.
I've not compared Aoni 001 to Okamoto 001. I was a loyal fan of Okamoto's 002, until 001 condoms came out.
Aoni is a HK funded brand, Guangzhou Daming United Rubber Products Ltd (China), is the manufacturer. So, if there is a preference for Japanese brands, Aoni may not be your choice.

For Aoni, I've tried 3 versions: Ultrathin, Nanosilver Ultrathin & Extra Smooth Ultrathin - these are fitted for average/normal-sized Asians (52mm width).
> From the ladies viewpoint (more importantly), they felt a difference with the Ultrathin and Nanosilver Ultrathin when compared to the Extra Smooth Ultrathin - they had a preference for this. Possibly, due to Collagen used on the Extra Smooth version as lube. But, they did not feel any difference between the Ultrathin and Nanosilver Ultrathin.
> For me, no discernible difference between the 3 versions. I'll continue using the baseline Ultrathin (cheapest).
> I'm not of size to try the XL Ultrathin version (54 mm width).

The 3 normal sized versions and the XL version are available at Watsons; and, online at Aoni's website. 1 box contains 12 pieces.

http://www.watsons.com.hk/search?text=Aoni  Ultrathin: HKD $159.

https://aonicondoms.com  Ultrathin: USD $17.99 (HKD $140) + shipping cost.

> Neglible price difference of getting them at Watsons versus on-line ordering, once shipping is added. Only if you order above a certain amount, there is free delivery within HK. For 1 box, I'd just get them at Watsons.
> There is a multi-pack multi-version of 4 normal sizes that is available on Aoni's website that is not available at Watsons. It's called: Four Play. You get 4 boxes of 3 pieces per box, for the 4 versions: Ultrathin, Nanosilver Ultrathin, Extra Smooth Ultrathin and Over-Time Combo. I guess, it's a "buffet" of condoms to try, if you've not tried this brand.
> I did not try the normal sized Over-Time Combo (OT) version, which is studded (supposedly more sensation for her) with an adjustable strap for longer erections. I can't be bothered with the strap. Only if you are curious, fyi: https://aonicondoms.com/about/our-technology/
> Just to be clear, there are 4 normal sized versions; plus, one XL version. 5 versions in total.

Recent Ratings
porkchops   19-6-2017 21:36  Acceptance  +4   Thanks for the info!
Freelancer   18-6-2017 20:47  Acceptance  +1   I have the Aoni 0.01 and they feel like regular condoms to me :(
Explorer1   18-6-2017 19:18  Acceptance  +3   Great! I hope they have this at ShenZhen Watson or HKG airport Manning
Top
porkchops
Forum Moderator
Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15



UID 170218
Digest Posts 0
Credits 5356
Posts 377
Karma 5246
Acceptance 2199
Reading Access 150
Registered 21-12-2016
Status Offline
Post at 19-6-2017 21:35  Profile Blog P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #5 rubmeinatub's post

I finally tried the Sagami brand for the first time last week. It felt great, I was really impressed by the increase in sensation!

I tried the Sagami 0.02 L-size, whose nominal width is 58mm +-2mm. It may sound like a lot, but Sagami are made from polyurethane, which are supposedly less stretchable than latex. That is why the regular size in Sagami is 55mm+-2, as opposed to regular size of 52mm in latex condoms. I often found the 52mm latex condoms to be a bit too tight, especially around the base of the penis, which is why I decided to go for the L-size. Unfortunately, Sagami 0.01 is only available at the regular size, which is why I went for the 0.02. They fit me like a glove, I felt no danger that it would slip off by mistake, but was not constricted either. This is for circumference of 5in, or maybe just a bit above.

I feel like it's a beginning of a new era for me with this increased sensitivity while covered! I might try the Aoni 0.01 XL, sometime too. If I understand correctly they are latex, so perhaps 54mm would be fine too.

[ Last edited by  porkchops at 19-6-2017 21:38 ]
Top
rubmeinatub
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 200342
Digest Posts 0
Credits 370
Posts 55
Karma 349
Acceptance 426
Reading Access 30
Registered 6-6-2017
Status Offline
Post at 19-6-2017 22:38  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply to Freelancer and porkchops.

Hi Freelancer, sorry to hear you found Aoni ordinary.
Perhaps, the Okamoto 0.01 Non-latex (Large) may be an option?
Given that Sagami apparently at least in HK, doesn't have a large size.
Okamoto 0.01 (Large), I don't think is available at Watsons/Mannings/HK pharmacies.

But, you can get them at ...

https://www.wanta.net/en/shop/li ... CatID=1&DepID=1
> Wanta has retail shops at Causeway Bay & Central.

Or online at ...
https://taketoys.hk  (just search: Okamoto 0.01 L)

http://www.sallystoy.com/s/intimate-care/condoms/condoms-for-him

Hi Porkchops, you are correct - Aoni is made of latex.
Perhaps Okamoto 0.01 Non-latex (Large) would be a consideration?

Skyn is another 0.01 Non-latex brand with an XL size.
> But I don't know if they retail in HK. Possibly, eBay ship to HK ?

Recent Ratings
porkchops   24-6-2017 21:11  Acceptance  +4   Thanks!
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 22-11-2024 17:33

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.026452 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.