thx to u guys for helping create a paradigm for dealing with FB and other social media.
i've been keeping track of these emerging technologies for years now. and i have a friend who always accuses me of being paranoid. then in later months he comes back to me and says: "Jack, NOW i know why you were cautious about _________."
it helps if u read books by Kevin Mitnick (the original 90s hacker who honed social engineering as a tool for privacy instrusion) and subscribe to Bruce Schneier's free Crypt-O-Gram [
u can subscribe by clicking HERE]). u don't have to have the mindset of "how do i break this and get someone's details" but it's good to read the thoughts of people who DO have that mindset. professionals like these have no personal stake in discovering your behavior.
your friends, enemies, frenemies, antagonists, mothers and whoever DO. they don't have the hacking skills of a Mitnick, but they have curiosity and motivation.
i don't do FB or social media, but awhile back i did what Intenseslacker described above: create a cyberpersona. i don't sign up for anything, HE does. i gave him a birthdate and other details that are easy to remember. one thing you must do with something like this is invent easy-to-remember answers for "security questions"--which are a primo way to hack into someone's acct.
for example, someone compromised the email acct of Lebanese-Mexican actress Salma Hayek (whose knickers i would eat without hummus or salsa, but that's a different story). how? all they needed was her email address, fire up the site, oops, i forgot my password. "security" question: "who's yr favorite artist?" as Hayek has publicly stated her admiration for Mexican painter Frida Kahlo, and played FK in a movie, how about "Frida" as a guess?
bam. hacker became Salma, created a new password, and started reading her emails. any attachments?
that was a complete stranger. what are the chances that someone closer to you wd have an EASIER time knowing yr email address and possible answers to "security" questions?
this is simply another part of the puzzle. now, imagine a certain person having access to ALL yr emails and attachments.
even so, email has few vectors. networks like FB have considerably more vectors.
i'm all for complete fiction on FB. the site earns advertising revenue, but according to a recent story: "each [Facebook] user on average brings in only US$4 in revenue versus US$189 for Amazon, US$39 for eBay, and US$25 for Google." yet when they IPO a few people are going to get very rich very fast. still, take another look at those numbers above. how can FB pump them up?
"Only by extracting more valuable and interesting data from its users, its only asset, can Facebook offer increasing value to advertisers and business partners."
"its users, its only asset." YOU. think they really care about the problems they might cause you due to yr private data being known by anyone and everyone?
think about it.
JtB