Originally posted by reggid at 3-5-2012 05:26 PM
I'd like to point out that while risk of getting HIV from BBBJ is very low, the article is not written from a punters perspective in that they are talking of the general public not WG who inherently a ...
People have to understand the difference between "theoretical risk" and a "documented case".
Yes, there is a "theoretical risk" of getting HIV from receiving BBBJ. There is also a theoretical risk getting struck by lightning 10 times in a row. Just because something can happen in theory doesn’t mean it has actually happened or even remotely likely to happen.
Here's more direct quotes from credible medical sources about the risk of HIV from BBBJ
=========================
University of California, San Francisco
http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/hiv?page=basics-00-08
"There are no known cases of someone getting HIV from receiving oral sex"
=========================
Minnesota AIDS Project
http://www.mnaidsproject.org/edu ... iv-transmission.php
"A person receiving oral sex is generally not at risk because that person is coming into contact only with saliva, which does not transmit HIV."
=========================
AIDS Vancouver
http://avi.org/page/can-man-get-hiv-getting-oral-sex
"There have been no documented cases of men getting HIV by receiving oral sex (getting a blow-job, being sucked off, getting head) ."
=========================
Nevada State Health Division, AIDS Program
http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Q9022.html?ic=2003
"Receiving oral sex is such an extremely low risk that it took many years of worldwide surveillance to find anyone becoming infected this way. Given enough time and enough opportunity, extremely rare events (like transmission through kissing and receiving oral sex) are bound to occur. With all the oral sex that occurs worldwide every day, the fact that it took so many years to find any cases worldwide, proves that this is an extremely low risk....We cannot say there is zero risk...since nothing in medicine (or life for that matter) is absolute or 100%. But realistically, the chances of infection by receiving oral sex are extremely small.
=========================
New Zealand AIDS Foundation
http://www.nzaf.org.nz/faqs/item/group/hiv-aids/
"Unprotected oral sex carries a very low risk of HIV transmission... [T]here would only be a risk of HIV if fresh blood inside the mouth of the person giving oral sex connected with the open cut on your penis."
=========================
The Canadian AIDS Society
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publi ... e_may_04/13-eng.php
The Canadian AIDS Society (CAS) currently classifies insertive fellatio [the receiver of oral sex] as carrying a negligible risk of HIV transmission regardless of condom use."
=========================
Centro Sanitario Sandoval, Madrid
http://www.avert.org/oral-sex.htm
"In June 2002, a study conducted amongst 135 HIV negative Spanish heterosexuals, who were in a sexual relationship with a person who was HIV positive, reported that over 19,000 instances of unprotected oral sex had not led to any cases of HIV transmission"
=========================
AIDSmed
http://www.aidsmeds.com/aboutus.shtml
"There have been three case reports and a few studies suggesting that some people have been infected with HIV as a result of unprotected oral sex. However, these case reports and studies all involved...the receptive partners (the person doing the "sucking")...There hasn't been a single documented case of HIV transmission to an insertive partner (the person being "sucked") during unprotected oral sex..."