bsnake
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 42706
Digest Posts 0
Credits 348
Posts 362
Karma 348
Acceptance 1
Reading Access 30
Registered 7-4-2010
Status Offline
Post at 27-7-2010 10:00  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Credit ratings for yuan local bonds

July 27 (Bloomberg) -- Credit ratings assigned to yuan- denominated bonds issued on behalf of local governments in China are misleading and don’t reflect risks investors face, Dagong Global Credit Rating Co.’s chairman said.
Local government-backed borrowers shopped around for the best rankings from Chinese ratings companies, Dagong Chairman Guan Jianzhong said yesterday during a Bloomberg Television interview in Beijing.

Guan Jianzhong, chairman of Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. Ltd., works at his desk at the company's office in Beijing. Photographer: Nelson Ching/Bloomberg

“Whoever gives them a better rating gets the business,” he said. “Local governments are very powerful. The current system doesn’t reflect all the risks.”
Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings drew criticism in the U.S. from investors and officials including Financial Crisis Inquiry Chairman Phil Angelides for assigning top rankings to mortgage-linked securities that crashed when the U.S. housing market collapsed in 2007.

Guan Jianzhong, chairman of Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. Ltd., poses for a portrait at the company's office in Beijing. Photographer: Nelson Ching/Bloomberg

Local governments in China set up financing vehicles to fund projects such as highways and airports with bonds and loans, due to limits on their ability to directly borrow money.
There are concerns Chinese banks may struggle to recoup about 23 percent of the 7.7 trillion yuan ($1.1 trillion) they’ve lent to finance local infrastructure projects, according to a person with knowledge of data collected by regulator the China Banking Regulatory Commission. China this year restricted borrowing on concern money isn’t being used for viable projects.
Danger Signals
“This is very dangerous,” Guan said. “If you look at the financial crisis, it was caused by an accumulation of credit risks. When it gets to a certain point, then a crisis breaks out.”
While Dagong expects defaults on these bank loans, there won’t be a systemic risk to the banking system as regulation has improved, he said.
Beijing-based and privately owned Dagong gave China’s government a higher debt rating than the U.S., U.K. or Japan in a report covering 50 nations it published this month.
China’s two other big ratings agencies are tie-ups with international partners. China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co. is a joint venture with Moody’s Corp., and China Lianhe Credit Rating Co. is a joint venture partner with Fitch Ratings Ltd.
Dagong has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission to start ratings coverage in the U.S. The firm expects a final SEC decision in September.
For Related News and Information: News on China’s economy: NI CHECO Top China stories: TOP CHINA People’s Bank of China Portal: PBOC Most-read stories about China: MNI CHINA 1W Most-read China economy stories: TNI CHECO MOSTREAD BN China economic statistics: ECST CH China economic snapshot: ESNP CH News on China’s currency: TNI CHINA FRX BN
Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 27-7-2010 10:46  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 bsnake's post

It's buyer beward and buy at your own risk. With these Chinese rating agencies they are not regulated and the Balance Sheets are hard to interpret because Chinese accounting standards are very different from Western standards. That said, Moody's wasn't that much better but after the financial crisis, I believe they have revamped their rating system.
Top
bsnake
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 42706
Digest Posts 0
Credits 348
Posts 362
Karma 348
Acceptance 1
Reading Access 30
Registered 7-4-2010
Status Offline
Post at 27-7-2010 19:33  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
This is pretty much what happened in the US.    The rating agencies were effectively conflicted because they were being paid by the person seeking the rating for it bonds, not the investors.  So the rating agency cannot by definition be completely objective. They are swayed by the comments of the person paying the bill.  This has not been corrected eve after the financial crisis. .
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 14-11-2024 01:57

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.033142 second(s), 8 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.