Porn firms halt filming over actor's HIV

LA porn production shuts down
October 14, 2010 - 2:51PM
LOS ANGELES – More than half a dozen pornographers in California's multibillion-dollar adult entertainment industry have halted production after an actor tested positive for HIV — and more shutdowns were expected.
Vivid Entertainment Group and Wicked Pictures were among the companies that announced production halts as a precaution.
"From Vivid's perspective, there was no question that when we heard this, we immediately shut down production and said let's get the facts and evaluate them before we move forward," Steven Hirsch, the founder of Vivid, one of the largest makers of adult films.
Advertisement: Story continues below
"Adult entertainment companies act responsibly, and no one wants to see another person test positive if there's anything they can do to stop it," he said.
Actors in movies by Wicked Pictures use condoms. Still, company president Steve Orenstein said two shoots were on hold and production depends on further HIV test results from a clinic that serves the industry.
PinkVisual Productions is also slated to halt production for at least a few weeks. Adult Video News reported additional shutdowns at Hustler Video, Digital Playground, Jennaration X Studios, Girlfriends Films and Kick Ass Pictures.
The identity and gender of the HIV-positive actor have not been released by the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation, the clinic where the case was discovered. The clinic was working to identify and test on-screen partners of the actor.
Since the 2004 outbreak, 25 cases of HIV have been discovered at the AIM clinic and at least eight of those were adult film performers, said Dr. Robert Kim-Farley, the communicable disease director of the Los Angeles County Public Health Department.
County public health officials and state occupational health officials have said the widespread lack of condom use on porn sets puts performers at risk of contracting HIV and other diseases. Adult film producers have said viewers find condoms to be a turnoff.
"We strongly feel that condom use should be required in this industry; just like a construction worker wouldn't go into a construction site without a hard hat, an adult industry performer should not be having sexual acts unprotected without a condom," said Kim-Farley.
Last year, a woman tested positive for HIV after making an adult film, and in 2004 an HIV outbreak affecting several actors spread panic in the industry and briefly shut down productions at several California studios.
In recent years, advocates and health officials have tussled with porn producers and free speech advocates over the use of condoms in adult films.
State workplace safety officials at Cal/OSHA are considering strengthening rules designed to prevent transmission of disease by requiring the use of condoms in the films.
Health and workplace safety officials say they have called on the clinic where the case was discovered to share redacted records that would indicate an infected worker's employment history, but the clinic has not complied.
Lawyers for the San Fernando Valley clinic said it was in full compliance with reporting and privacy laws, and health officials have overstepped their bounds in the past.
The lawyers said in a statement Wednesday that a Northern California judge has gone so far as to stop state officials from getting identifying information because it violates medical privacy regulations.
HIV is spread most often through sexual contact but can also be contracted through sharing contaminated needles for drug use, infected blood products, or by babies born to or breast-fed by infected women.
HIV is the cause of AIDS, an immune disease that gradually destroys the body's ability to fight illness.
In an average month, Vivid spends $US250,000 to shoot four movies, which require a total of 12 to 15 days of shooting, Hirsch said.
The company currently has a stockpile of unreleased movies, and it would take months without any new production activity to affect Vivid's release schedule, he added.
Mark Kernes, senior editor at Adult Video News, said he expects most production companies to shut down until it's known who had contact with the person known to have HIV.
It's unclear how the industry's bottom line might be affected by halted production because many companies such as Vivid could sustain sales with backlogs of unreleased titles, Kernes said.
Like other entertainment industries, adult film makers have been hurt by the recession and the Internet, where pirating and free downloads often cut producers out of a profits.
Last year, in a tongue-in-cheek complaint about the sour economy, Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt and Girls Gone Wild chief executive Joe Francis called for a $5 billion federal bailout. They said adult DVD sales and rentals decreased 22 per cent.
Link here:
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainm ... 014-16l1c.html#poll

[ Last edited by  atomic3d at 14-10-2010 12:27 ]

If vivid is making movies for $62,500 each then the pornstars can't be taking home big pay cheques.

porn stars make about $1200 USD per scene, used to be about $2000 pre-internet wide releases.
you can find this article here:

http://www.canadianbusiness.com/ ... 0100927_10019_10019

It's a high risk job.  However somebody has to teach people how to have sex, or we get less babies.
In the 1970's the United States suffered a huge population drop when porn was driven back.  In the 80's
when porn was better legalized under the supreme court ruling as a 1st amendment issue from the constitution,
the population went up.  As much as American society hates porno, it needs it to have another generation.

Or it could have something to do with the baby boomers reaching parenting age.  That's a really far stretch to link birth rates to porn.

Wow, they only get paid us$1200 per scene? That is underpayment IMO for such a high risk job, as most of them do BJ and ML without condom, and the chances of catching HIV seems to be quite high! Some of them must be real sex maniacs to do this job for relatively little money. Maybe they should all wear condoms, as they often do in Japanese AVs.

are you sure about that? I find it doubtful and hard to believe that the prevalence of porn can have an effect on birth rate, especially in developed countries where there is sex ed in schools. I mean take a look at Japan. lots of porn, much more publicly accepted than in many other countries, and yet their birth rate is in the negative.

Chewie, you're saying that if there is no porn, there is no sex? That's rather ridiculous. What about China? They had a population explosion in the 50s and 60s and I don't think they've ever heard of porn back then.

Is it really a high risk job?  Having unprotected sex with strangers is one thing, but porn actors are required to be tested within 6 weeks before a shoot.  I wonder what the statistics would show if it were possible to compare the general population's incidence of HIV versus porn star incidence of HIV and do it on a per-intercourse basis?  

For all of us bums, unprotected sex with hookers is a death wish, but I don't think it's the same level of risk for a porn actor.  Although I'm just speculating here . . .