I often don't understand what is the mix up between the breasts size mentionned in the girl's profile and what you can see of her in the pictures (not to say about what you find in real when visiting the girl).

But let stay about the pics vs info.
I can understand that girl/papa try to improve the breast figures "on the paper" compare to reality (example : real is 34B and info says 34C)
I can understand also in the same way that girl/papa ask the photographer to make a PS work to improve the size of the breasts according to the info (example : real is 34B, info says 34C and work is done on pics to look like a 34C too).

What i don't understand is when info says 34C and that the pictures show obviously more than that, like this girl Lok Yee.
If the pictures are not PSed and show the real size of her breasts, then it's not a C cup... or am i wrong in the standards ?

What I don't understand is when the info says 34D and that the pictures show obviously that the girl has not more than a 34B (don't want to take to much of my time to find an example but i can see this regularly in the DB).

PS : Ok i know that all the figures mentionned on the profile have to be taken carefully and not as 100% accurate. This happens to the height very often too. But this is not proper to the DB... 99,9% of the girls in Asia are giving a higher height than what they are really. It's like they allways keep the high heels shoes when they measure themselves

It's a sales job, they're just giving you their best sales pitch, don't believe all that you see or read on the DB. When you visit a girl if you don't like what you see then walk away.

The only effective way to deal with these inaccuracies is for members to take their own pictures and post them with reports. Nearly every report that I've written has some accompanying photos that show what the girl really looks like. These don't have to be fancy, nudity isn't needed. But just getting ANY picture helps us all tremendously.

Just my 2 cents ;-)

-G

[ Last edited by  G-A-R-Y at 29-3-2009 15:37 ]

gary:

...right about that!... ...pictures are always appreciated in reports...

I know that it's a sales job... but com'on... what do they think ? that we are morrons ?
I mean it's not giving me any good reason to "buy" when i can see some inaccuracies like this.
I agree with you that we should not believe in what we see or read... but still that's what we do... at least half of the time.
How many of us visit only girls that have had good reports on the forum ?
Because this is the only other point (and the most trustfull i reckon) that we can base our decision on to go or not to go.

My meaning is that i'm sure that almost each of us has already been visiting a girl he has seen on the DB and not been favorably reported yet.
So in that case... what are we basing our decision on ?
Of couse... on what we can read and what we can see on pics... even if we are aware of the risk that it's 99.9% never accurate.

Of course when we go for a girl and don't like what we see... then we can walk away... but i prefer to minimize this kind of situation to avoid loosing my time and being frustrated.
The only time where i don't feel too pissed off to reject a girl is when i already had a shot in the day !
Then it can make me feel even good to think i'm saving some money

Yes you are right bro !
And i try to do same as you... even if i can not do every time or even if the quality of the own pictures is not so good.
It's still give some new view about how the girl is in "real".

But as said in my previous post, that supposed to visit only girls that have been reported before and with pictures.
The advantage is to feel maybe more confident about the look and the service we can get with the girl (even if not guaranteed 100% as we know it can be different attitude from 1bro to another... from 1day to another, etc.)

But i have to say that it's also good to go for adventure and try a girl that has not been reported yet.
More risky (not about safety but about how the girl will look and be) but exciting to find maybe a new gem and to feel more explorer

chiron:

...agree on trying the new and untested...however, hard if what you like is a certain type....there were almost 200 hgs in tst today but i found less than 20 that i REALLY want to fukk ...and among those only a certain amount will do what i require in a sesh so in a way, my requirements and what i want does not fully fit to your rationale...

but the beautiful thing about this hobby is that anything goes for any one of us "average joes"....whatever makes you world tick, go knock ya self out!!...

one just needs to be careful...the goods are not always what they claim...i say, when you enter, if the goods are not up to snuff, just try the next door!

The papa/mama 'sans know many of the bros think with their little head when they arrive.  It's just like bullworker said.  Think of it as a loss-leader except they're using photoshop and modified stats.

In NA rubs you don't usually get to negotiate services until after the massage.  These girls would start the heavy petting/teasing and ask you if you want the 'special' then ask how much are you willing to pay.  At that moment it's pretty hard to concentrate when she's literally got you by the balls! But yeah, you can always say "No."

Chiron,

I try to mix up a going to "new" girls and ones that have been reported on. I'm willing to take my chances and go out on a limb for the greater good of all our members, but it's better to have some idea of what to expect when possible.

There's two issues in play here:

1. These girls are busy, if any given girl with a "hot" DB entry has 6-8 visitors a day, then that's over 20 punters that could have written a report and/or posted pictures within the FIRST THREE DAYS!
   
   
2. At least some of the papa's read the forums, so if we're always posting reports and warnings within days of a new girl showing up, they'll quickly get the hint that they shouldn't lie and/or overuse photoshop, because it will get them bad review scores and/or bad marks on accuracy of the DB claims. In some cases the papas themselves are getting good and bad reputations for their behavior. It's all being tracked by our members as best we can, and there really aren't a lot of second chances in building trust with us.

Our "adventure" times would be better in an environment where the papas have been "scared straight" and don't feel like they can get away with lying to us.

-G

[ Last edited by  G-A-R-Y at 29-3-2009 15:50 ]