Twice, I have nothing against the OP and have been kind of waiting for him to clarify things. Anyway, here is my take. He can tell his side of the story when he reads this.
On Friday the OP posted a review on Lola from Kama (
http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... 04&highlight=). The report was posted at 21:41 and was edited at 23:12. In fact, there was an earlier version of this report. Those people who were on this forum that night (sad bastards like me who have nothing better to do on a Friday night) would know that the original version of the report contains 4-5 explicit photos of the girl, of her in massage action and in full frontal nudity in shower. The style of the photos is similar to those in another of his reports (
http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... 82&highlight=): fixed camera angle, with the girl appearing totally oblivious of being photographed.
When asked how he took those photos, he said they were "timer selfie... ..she allowed as long no face is in there.." I for one never buy this kind of explanations. No WG would allow people to take photos of her especially when the photos will be posted on the internet. When a girl knows that (and approves of) she is being photographed, she always looks at the camera. My theory is the OP hid his phone in a bag which was positioned to catch the action. I know some losers like to do this sort of things but it is very rare for anyone to post the photos on a hobbyist website. Anyway, as I don't know the girl in that report I kind of kept this opinion to myself.
On Friday, when I saw his report on Lola, I was quite sure the photos he posted were captured without the girl's consent. I am a regular of Kama and know the girls there. I respect them for their work ethics, good nature and generally upbeat personality. When I saw those photos, I immediately commented, in the rating box, "setting up a spy camera on an unsuspecting girl is the lowest of behaviours". When I checked the forum later that night, I found the OP had deleted his report, including my comment, and posted the same thing without the photos as a new report. My interpretation is that instead of arguing about my accusation, he quietly admitted the dubious origin of his photos.
When I went to Kama for a massage on the next day, the girls were in a deep discussion about something serious. Since I know the place so well, I asked them what happened. Apparently some bros have screen-captured his report before he deleted it, including the photos, and sent it to Kama. The girls were extremely emotional about this. I pretended not knowing anything about this and was told that, apparently, taking spy camera photos of WG at work is one of the worst offences in this business.
What amazed me this morning was the OP has the balls to post another report on Kama, complaining about the lukewarm service he received after what he did there. He should have been felt lucky that she didn't cut his bollocks off (if he really did go back)! About why Kama still served him, I actually have a theory. But I do not want to state my theory until I have more facts.
So, there you have it. I am not impressed that some bros have breached the secrecy of this forum (again!) but this time they did it to warn the girls. It seems that the girls are warning their friends in other spas about the OP and it spreads like wildfire in the industry. The fact that he has posted photos of his naked self in another report actually makes him very easily identifiable.
The above is what I gather as I happen to be one of the few who saw the original report he posted and then went to Kama on the next day. I welcome the OP to correct me when he comes in - I will offer my full apology if I was mistaken in any way.
