Subject: Cute activist chick gets tackled...and attention
billyhamlan
Banned




UID 1316
Digest Posts 0
Credits 347
Posts 214
Karma 346
Acceptance 25
Reading Access 0
Registered 30-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 22-7-2008 07:17  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #14 Marsupial's post

The media in the USA also has full control of what goes out to the public.

Many stories that could harm a company are put to rest early in the game before being reported.

A case and point is Monsanto.  They made a drug that produced more milk but caused strange side effects in the animals and could potentially cause the same in humans...yet they were able to continue to sell it because the threat was not made public and when it was made public, it was controlled to the point that it had no impact...that I think is a pretty good way to control "the media".

I'm not saying the CCP are great and have a wonderful way of doing things in China...and I don't agree with some of the practices of corporations in the US.  But I'm happy living here in Hong Kong  
Top
Marsupial (Saint Marsupial)
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 2909
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3497
Posts 3164
Karma 3478
Acceptance 370
Reading Access 70
Registered 18-8-2007
Location Lost in Space
Status Offline
Post at 22-7-2008 13:14  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by billyhamlan at 22-7-2008 07:17
The media in the USA also has full control of what goes out to the public.

That is a tautology. Since the media is, by definition, the sum of all means by which information is communicated to the public, they necessarily control all that is published. The newspaper companies control what gets written in the papers, the TV broadcasters determine what appears on the home set, etc. etc.

However, it is paranoid nonsense to think that news unfavorable to Big Business is suppressed in the States. Tho it does sometimes happen that a particular broadcaster or newspaper will avoid publishing some item damaging to a company with which it has some commercial relationship, that would not stop someone else from going public with the news. It does, however, frequently happen that to avoid being sued, a broadcaster will not publish something unless it is well substantiated.

There are far too many competing, independent news sources in the States for information to be controlled. I've read plenty of bad press on Monsanto in the New York Times, for instance. In any case, the American press is full of news critical of corporate behavior.

The only thing that even comes close to self-censorship in the States is the kind of thing that happened in the run-up to the Iraqi war when the American press got all caught up in post-911 patriotic hysteria and swallowed all that Bush administration bullshit on Saddam Husein. But that only lasted for a year or so before the liberal press began to savage the Bushites.

[ Last edited by  Marsupial at 23-7-2008 00:28 ]




孔子曰: 君子不羞于舔屄也
Top
billyhamlan
Banned




UID 1316
Digest Posts 0
Credits 347
Posts 214
Karma 346
Acceptance 25
Reading Access 0
Registered 30-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 22-7-2008 13:19  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
good points

i realize the amount of control is different. I am in no way defending the ccp for their actions of censorship. I was just saying it does happen elsewhere.  The government in the US does like to ke their secrets...and they say you have access to the files later but at the moment when it matters...sometimes the govt goes too far. just some thoughts.
Top
goodjob (The Celestial Heavens)
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 10415
Digest Posts 0
Credits 839
Posts 799
Karma 839
Acceptance 0
Reading Access 40
Registered 12-4-2008
Status Offline
Post at 22-7-2008 13:25  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #102 Marsupial's post

so right now Obama is your choice, I think.
Top
Siklong69
Master Mongerer
Rank: 8Rank: 8


UID 3523
Digest Posts 0
Credits 5175
Posts 3242
Karma 5099
Acceptance 1529
Reading Access 80
Registered 3-10-2007
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 22-7-2008 23:14  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Agree with billyhamlan

Yes, I love HK too! In spite of everything it is a damned good place and I believe we have more freedom here than any
place on earth. The one thing that annoys me, however, is busybodies contantly complaining about everything.
Top
billyhamlan
Banned




UID 1316
Digest Posts 0
Credits 347
Posts 214
Karma 346
Acceptance 25
Reading Access 0
Registered 30-4-2007
Status Offline
Post at 23-7-2008 16:09  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
land of complainers

I've found myself complaining a few times...about bad service!
Top
goodjob (The Celestial Heavens)
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 10415
Digest Posts 0
Credits 839
Posts 799
Karma 839
Acceptance 0
Reading Access 40
Registered 12-4-2008
Status Offline
Post at 23-7-2008 18:10  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #105 Siklong69's post

One thing I dont like about H.K is the cabby attitude and service!
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 16-11-2024 23:48

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.024861 second(s), 8 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.