I normally would not post a "counter report", because I broadly agree with the assessments 90% of the time on this forum.
But in this case, I feel an obligation to chime in because the other assessment of 712 is so, so far off the mark. And I fear that some unwitting bros will take it at face value and waste their money on this girl.

1. She is not a C-cup, not even close. She's got those small, plum sized boobs that somehow manage to both be underwhelming and saggy at the same time, like small deflated balloons.
2. Those photos are of her, but with LOTS of makeup and PS. In practice she wears next to no makeup, and looks 6/10 at best. I realize this is a matter of personal taste, but calling her a 9/10 is like saying Rachel Zegler is the prettiest actress in Hollywood.
3. Figure-wise, she's 6/10 at best. 165cm or so, average bust to hip ratio, decent butt, not fat. Quite dark skinned, like in photos. That's about it.
4. Service was the most mechanical, non-committal, desultory experience I've had in recent memory. She didn't say a word without me prompting, and answered in 1 word answers. The actual sexual services were mediocre as well.
And no, this wasn't because it was super late and she was tired, it was in the early evening and she had only seen 2 guys before me.

The room was horrendous too.

She scattered makeup items all over the floor next to the mirror (which is odd since she wore no makeup). There were multiple takeout meals half eaten, still open, piled on the coach.
She had no cover on the bed and was about to do the deed on the dirty bed before I insisted she put one of those big disposable towels over it.

I won't bore you with the details, they're honestly not worth getting into. She's just a lazy girl who hates the job, puts in no effort, and wants you out the door as soon as possible.

--

I've been on this forum since 2011, and I generally agree with the assessments of the other bros here, but occasionally you'll see a report that's just so wildly off the mark.

I realize that there's an element of personal taste, but there are practical limits; you're gonna have a real hard time finding men who honestly think that Lizzo is more attractive than Sydney Sweeney.

MMN is extremely dishonest with the pictures and the reviews. She does a good job of making them look like real reviews, but they're almost all fake. When you meet the actual girls, you're lucky if they're even 50% as attractive as in the photos.
The only credit I can give to MMN is that at least the pictures are of the girls, even if they're PSed to the high heavens.

I've gone through about a dozen of MMN's girls over the years, and only 2 have lived up their photos: Emma, one his regulars and easily the best girl in his stable (she's very temperamental though, thus the mixed reviews, if she likes you, she'll treat you well, if not, then she won't), and another random girl who won't be returning.

Sorry that you had a bad experience. I stand by my comments and I also agree that MM girls often hit / miss. My last experience before 712 was worse that I had!

As I said for 712, the initial engagement was little cold had to work her with lots of charm to get her engaged. I can totally see if she’s not in the right state of mind it can be bad experience.

Thanks for your review I was planning to see her again before she goes but recognise she might have had enough of her time here (leaving in a few days no incentive to give great service). I’ll try another girl instead.

Keep up the reviews lads!