Today, the same people who brought you Kate Upton, Jennifer Lawrence, and others' nude photos two weeks ago just released more nude photos of celebrities such as Kim Kardashian, Mary-Kate Olsen, and more. The pics were available on Reddit but have now been removed. Files, however, can be downloaded via torrent on kickass torrent's website.

Enjoy!

Keep on chugging..

http://fap.jesus.si/

Am I the only one here who is not comfortable with this thread? These images are clearly illegal and of bad taste. Why are the moderators allowing this being discussed here?

Is it any different to pics of ladies that appear on this site or other similar sites. I doubt that the ladies gave permission or eben know their pictures are on this site.

True in some sense but the girls know that when we take a picture that this could be the case but these are stolen images and I for one will not bother, would you be happy if it was your picture spread all over the internet for the world to see?

Nope.... that's why there are no photos of disrepute of me online. Haha. I don't condone hacking to obtain these photos, but they are already out there. If we don't obtain the information from here, those who are looking for said information, is surely to find it. Authorities sho7ld use the n7mbEr of downloads as motivation to quickly nab these perpetrators before it happens again.

Nope.... that's why there are no photos of disrepute of me online. Haha. I don't condone hacking to obtain these photos, but they are already out there. If we don't obtain the information from here, those who are looking for said information, is surely to find it. Authorities sho7ld use the n7mbEr of downloads as motivation to quickly nab these perpetrators before it happens again.

I am sorry maybe I have misunderstood the forum guidelines. I thought any illegal matters will be frowned upon. I agree that though illegal those photos are already out there.
By the way, I just looked for the forum guidances and found that the thread is RA120. So strange?

celebrities are public figures. I don't see a problem with it, and perhaps it helps their celebrity status.

Keep on mongering

Can you honestly say that when you take a pic that the LADY suspects that her pic may end up on this site or similar - Give me a break !

Can you honestly say that when you take a pic that the LADY suspects that her pic may end up on this site or similar - You are being selective in your argument - The key is not stolen images, but PERMISSION to use images. As long as pics of ladies/gents are posted on this site, you can hardly complain about hacking images - And I'd argue this is even worse - At least the hacked image must have been put online by the person/s who took the pics - whereas the image placed on this site or similar may have never appeared online EVER, except for the person taking the pic.

"At least the hacked image must have been put online by the person/s who took the pics" ?????????????????

So the person puts there pic's onto a secure personal site (they are idiots but they have a right to privacy) is giving permission for people to hack their accounts and freely post the pictures in the public domain on other sites?

With the working Girls they are freely giving permission to take their photo's, those that say no are saying no for one reason and that is they do not want the picture being posted on line. I have photo's of several WG's that asked me not to post their pictures and I have kept them private.

This site will only allow pictures that were taken with the girls permission for a reason (they gave permission = legal, Sneaky photo's no permission = Illegal)

I think you are being selective in your argument as well, if you think its all right to look at them go ahead who am I to stop you but it is my choice not to as well.

So you can safely vouch that every pic on this site and in all sites permission has been given ?

So you ask/tell all ladies that you will publish their pics on this forum or others ?

Strange that I have seen a few pics of friends online and told them - They had no idea, and friends show me pics of acquantaintances online - They have no idea !

There is a reason why there are less pics online than a few years ago - Ladies are finding about pics being posted online and in many cases refusing to allow pics to be taken.

And this supports your belief its Ok to look at those pictures that you know are illegally posted in what way?

I do not come to this site to look at the pictures anyway, I come here for information about punting in different places. I have never read a report and then gone looking for that particular WG so the photo's mean very little.

There is a mountain of free porn on the internet but you don't know if the girl gave permission for it to be released and you still look at it(so do I) but with the leaked celebrity photo's you know for a fact it was illegally released.

By the way are you upset with me to make you feel better about looking at those photo's or you just don't like the fact that I made a moral decision not to look?

Deflection and more deflection - We are not discussing who looks at celebrity pics - Though the female pics dont have that much interest for me !

The fact is that if you put pics on the web there is a chance they may be hacked.

Different to a guy/girl taking pics - One party keeps the pics and they suddenly appear on the web in a sex forum - A big world of difference.

Which guy, petay?  Cruman?  Cantik is a WG, which I thought was common knowledge by now.   http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... &extra=page%3D1
Actually, I find her posts informative.

[ Last edited by  Thai-delight at 22-10-2014 10:38 ]