So as to improve quality tourism in Hong Kong, I've decided to introduce a "No-Fakes Index" to my reports.

It would involve adding or taking away marks based on how the real girl's appearance (marks out of 10) compared to the ad photos (marks out of 10).

---

"REAL APPEARANCE" - "AD APPEARANCE" = NO FAKES INDEX

The range is from -10 to +10.

-10 to 0 = Real girl worse than photos
0 = What you see is what you get
0 to +10 = Real girl better than photos

Of course, it would be very hard to get outside -5 or +5

---

For example, a while back I tried a girl called AE.  Her ad was really not bad, maybe even 9/10, but on reality I would only give her 6.5

6.5 - 9 is a No Fakes Index of -2.5
In other words, expect to be slightly dissappointed

If a girl looks exactly the same as the ads, no matter how good or bad, she can get a "0" (zero).


From the photos on the DB I would give Magic Bed and Pussy 0/10, but maybe, just maybe, she is 1/10 in real life.  (I wouldn't know as I've never seen her)... but in this case, she'd get an index of +1, as she's slightly better than the photos.

A top hotel girl could also get +1 if she looks slightly better than the DB pix.

What do you guys think?

Prince,

It's a good idea, but I kinda did something like this already. Check out the reports that I posted last month. I added a "DB Accuracy" field that reflected this, but stuck with the same 0 to 5 range that's used for the other measurements.

I also added an "English" field that rated their proficiency in speaking English.

Here are some examples:

• Jennifer
• Baby
• Grace

-G
b