atomic3d
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 41127
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3282
Posts 2642
Karma 3157
Acceptance 2501
Reading Access 70
Registered 10-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2010 19:00  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
To Get Rich is Glorious

To Get Rich is Glorious
By Bill Bonner

Imagine the looks on their faces, when Deng Xiaoping sold them out.

The old commies in China had tried to make steel in backyard barbecues. They'd carried the fat Mao on a litter, on a long march to nowhere. They'd pretended his Little Red Book was more than drivel. They'd endured one absurdity after another...purges, starvation, and misery...all for the cause.

And now this...

"To get rich is glorious..." Xiaoping is alleged to have said.

Whether he said it or not, millions of Chinese took it to heart. They got richer, faster than any people ever had. The economy is now 10 times larger than it was then; it grew 300% just in the last 10 years. Incomes rose every year. There are now more millionaires in China than in France. Three times as many as in Britain. And more people are becoming millionaires there than anywhere else on earth.

Three decades ago, the world's hinge creaked. Deng Xioaping opened a door in 1979. He announced a new oddity, a "socialist market economy."

We can imagine the looks on faces in Washington and London too. And why shouldn't they gloat? They had won the Cold War; they had no idea that their victory would be fatal.

China took the capitalist road in 1979. Russia was not far behind. By the mid-'80s, it was already spending half its entire output on its military. And then the Americans started talking about neutron bombs and a "star wars" program. Leonid Brezhnev had a stroke. His successors faced the challenge, first with perestroika and finally with capitulation.

Meanwhile doors opened and shut in England, France and America, too. Maggie Thatcher moved into #10 Downing St. in 1979. Ronald Reagan brought 'Morning in America' to the White House in 1980. Like Thatcher and Xioaping, Reagan was determined to reduce the government's role in the economy. And in 1981, Francois Mitterand entered the Elysee Palace in France. His stated goal was the opposite - to increase state involvement in the economy.

No matter what direction they claimed to be going, all the western economies ended up in more or less the same place - on the road to debt serfdom. While China got rich by encouraging (or perhaps merely allowing) capital formation, western nations got poorer, relatively, by consuming capital.

In France, and much of the rest of Europe, government led the consumption boom. While households continued saving at relatively high levels, Mitterand raised the cost of the welfare state. Minimum wages went up 10% immediately. Then, he cut the workweek and added so many benefits for the workingman that the system barely worked at all. French government debt rose from 20% of GDP in 1980 to 80% now; in a couple more years, the government will have spent an entire year's output that France had not yet put out.

In Britain and America, government spending rose too. But household spending went up even faster. The resulting boom was almost magical; the effects were diabolical. Britain went from a debt/GP ratio of 43% in 1980, to over 65% today. Its deficits rose up too and now are projected to be the highest in the European Union - as much as 13% of GDP. But the big expansion in both Britain and America was in private household debt. Combined with government borrowing, it pushed total debt from about 150% of GDP in the mid-'80s to as high as 400% today.

Japan - the other major 'western' economy - has total government debt of nearly 200% of GDP. Its deficit is now so large that it must borrow an amount equal to the total it collects in income taxes. It is said, of course, that Japan has much debt but also much savings. The trouble is, the savings and the debt are largely the same money. Households saved. Government borrowed the money. The savings that are supposed to offset the debt have already been spent.

All together, Europe, America and Japan have total government debt of about $32 trillion, compared to total output of $34 trillion. Add $50 trillion or so of private debt, and you begin to see the bottom of the hole. In other words, the developed economies have borrowed nearly 3 years' worth of future output. At 5% interest, (investors recently wanted Greece to pay 16%!) this means the western world must give up all the output from January 1st to the end of February just to stay in the same place.

Meanwhile, back in China, last week's visit to Beijing revealed a glorious transformation. In the early '80s, a visit to China was a hardship. The streets were drab. The people were drabber, in their grey clothes and grey towns. They stared at tourists as they had never before seen a capitalist. Minders still accompanied tourists. Most of the country was off-limits. There were few private automobiles and few roads deserving of them.

In just 3 decades Beijing has become one of the world's most dynamic, forward-leaning cities, with new Audis and Mercedes bumper to bumper...as far as the eye can see. There are sparkling office towers with millions of earnest workers...and gleaming hotels with sleek prostitutes in the lobbies. Chinese entrepreneurs hustle deals at every table.

China is still an emerging economy. Europe, Japan and the USA, on the other hand, are submerging - sinking in a sea of debt. Getting rich is glorious. Getting poor is a damned shame.

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia
Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2010 19:21  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
"To get rich is glorious" Deng had actually said this. He also said "Let some people get rich first". When he was questioned about this by some party members at the Peoples's Congress he explained "It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice".

When criticized by older party members for being a capitalist running dog, he said that China will not stray from the path of communism but will adamantly practice "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics"

Deng was the one with the greatest quotes, not Chairman Mao whose quotes from the Red Book were rather stale, always referring to everything as being a class struggle or to revolt and war. One of Mao's famous quotes at the time was "To read too many books is harmful."

[ Last edited by  geoduck at 18-6-2010 19:23 ]
Top
Kennichi
Kinky King
Rank: 5Rank: 5


UID 9144
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1607
Posts 1363
Karma 1569
Acceptance 759
Reading Access 50
Registered 6-3-2008
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2010 21:58  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 atomic3d's post

The USA has a nuclear bomb in Beijing though, one which is incredibly powerful and can be used as a decaptitation strike.It cuts both ways though as China didn't turn up for a bond auction after the Kitty Hawk incident.

Quite simply the USA can default on its debt, it is already doing so by printing money which is pissing China off immensly. Ergo they are persuing a partial default.


Depends who would be hurt more, the CCP who holds 1.3 trn of US debt or the US which would suddenly have the slate wiped clean. They control the IMF and have the most powerful war machine on the planet, what's China going to do demand it back underforce of arms?




Life is short very...
Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 18-6-2010 22:33  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #3 Kennichi's post

The US has never defaulted on a debt in its history. No possibility of that at all. It would be a complete collapse to the financial system. Foreign debt is part of the National Debt which is money the Government has borrowed. Most of this National Debt is not owed to Foreigners but to US banks and pension funds. No one will deal with the US again and as a trading partner, it's over. So what happens then, go to war? How will the US pay for its army then when the US$ is worth nothing.
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 14-11-2024 20:09

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.029913 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.