Subject: Sarah Ferguson declined $3m sex with Saudi prince
  This thread has been closed by sexyloser at 18-5-2024 08:45. 
atomic3d
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 41127
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3282
Posts 2642
Karma 3157
Acceptance 2501
Reading Access 70
Registered 10-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 09:17  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Sarah Ferguson declined $3m sex with Saudi prince

THE Duchess of York's biographer, Alan Starkie, said she declined numerous offers of money over the year.
Sarah Ferguson, caught in a tabloid sting last week offering to sell access to ex-husband Prince Andrew for ₤500,000 ($850,000), even turned down a $US3 million ($3, 548,000) offer from a Saudi prince she called "Rubber Lips" who wanted to bed her, Starkie said.
"A blue jeans manufacturer offered a million pounds ($1.7 million) for the duchess to simply model a pair for publicity photos.
"A prominent American real estate developer promised her a free condominium on Central Park South ... in return for permission to mention that she was a tenant," said the author of Fergie: Her Secret Life.
"A West End (of London) theatre suggested that she portray the wild Queen Boadicea, who had opposed the Romans, opposite Peter O'Toole in a limited engagement for a quarter of a million pounds ($427,000).
"A clever East End businessman offered a pound per night ($1.70) for each occupant of his proposed Duchess of York Old Age Homes."
Nonetheless, "she insisted on hiring a retinue of servants that she felt was necessary to provide the right environment for her two daughters, who were, after all, princesses," he said.
When the British aristocrat's debts approached £3 million ($5.1 million), he "introduced her to a member of the Saudi royal family who was willing to pay it off completely.
"I arranged for Sarah to visit him ... He met her alone, clad in flowing robes and a lascivious grin ... When he tried to kiss her, she fled home and quickly called me, referring to the fellow dismissively as 'Rubber Lips', indicating that when those lips sprung forward and plastered themselves upon her mouth, 'it felt like extricating oneself from a suction cup' as she pulled free.
"Perhaps one does not think it is laudatory simply not to prostitute oneself, or to turn down offers that seem too pedestrian for royalty. But it remains that she did turn them down. She had limits," Starkie said.
 
Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 10:00  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 atomic3d's post

Think it is just total BS that Fergie would reject US$3m from the Saudi prince. It's certainly more than what she can make from her book deal because she's no longer news worthy. Any woman who is in debt and rejects that amount is either stupid or is lying. She is not a virtuous woman, has been divorced from Prince Andrew a long time and her princess daughters are not in line for the throne so what's there to worry about.  The Duchess has already done silly, demeaning TV commercials in the US before so why is sleeping with an Arab prince one time so bad? It would have little impact on the Royal Family as the public know she's no good even before she got caught on tape extorting money from the reporter posing as a businessman. The British public are no longer easily shocked by what the Royals can be capable of especially after the antics of Princess Di.

[ Last edited by  geoduck at 1-6-2010 10:08 ]
Top
javku
Lustful Lord
Rank: 4


UID 39687
Digest Posts 0
Credits 971
Posts 254
Karma 967
Acceptance 74
Reading Access 40
Registered 11-2-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 12:01  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I also would do the same thing as she did, I will reject $3M to sleep with any Saudi Prince , but I don't mind to sleep with her if she wanted to pay me for less than $3M
Top
hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .)
Fucking Legend
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


UID 2748
Digest Posts 0
Credits 16230
Posts 12435
Karma 16060
Acceptance 3408
Reading Access 100
Registered 5-8-2007
Location Pussy Paradise, Earth
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 14:06  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 atomic3d's post

she is whack and darn old....Saudi Prince must be blind...
Unless he was thinking to put her on with abaya and hijab when banging the old hag.

This news/gossip is disturbing and not entertaining at all....




Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Top
geoduck
Godfather of Hole
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


UID 41248
Digest Posts 0
Credits 7512
Posts 3232
Karma 7419
Acceptance 1854
Reading Access 90
Registered 12-3-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 14:15  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by hunter at 1-6-2010 14:06
she is whack and darn old....Saudi Prince must be blind...
Unless he was thinking to put her on with abaya and hijab when banging the old hag.

This news/gossip is disturbing and not entertaining at all... ...

Your spin on it certainly makes it entertaining.
Top
TonyToro
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 37475
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4498
Posts 2853
Karma 4389
Acceptance 2182
Reading Access 70
Registered 7-1-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 19:11  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I think she should pay the Bro to sleep with her... she's not exactly "hot"...
Top
dukebeard
Nookie Newbie
Rank: 1



UID 45895
Digest Posts 0
Credits 24
Posts 31
Karma 24
Acceptance 1
Reading Access 10
Registered 1-6-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-6-2010 22:15  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L


QUOTE:
Originally posted by hunter at 1-6-2010 14:06
she is whack and darn old....Saudi Prince must be blind...
Unless he was thinking to put her on with abaya and hijab when banging the old hag.

This news/gossip is disturbing and no ...

my thoughts exactly
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 23-9-2024 13:30

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.117029 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141LOVE.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141LOVE.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141LOVE.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141LOVE.COM reserves all the legal rights.