What are some of the techniques you've used to tell the difference between natural and surgically enhanced breasts.  If it's silicon vs natural tissue, it's pretty easy.  Have the woman lay flat on her back.  If the breast is erect, then it's likely fake while the natural tissue tend to scatter and flatten more.  Also, the textures are pretty different by just feeling them.  However, with saline vs natural tissue is a bit harder.  How do you tell the difference?

cut them open ...

Poorly done fake ones are usually rock hard and easy to spot. I've also found that you can usually see a tiny scar while in mish or doing DATY.

ｕｓｅ　ａ　ｔｏｒｃｈｌｉｇｈｔ．

Might as well as drag a x-ray machine or a mammogram in there while we are at it.  Maybe someone can invent a silicone detector, like metal detectors, that goes off when it's near a concentrated quantity of silicone.

real are more soft and will move more than the fake one.
If it is some fake boob, when the girl jump it will move up and down differently than real one.

Anyway, I prefer a real B cup baby than a fake E cup baby.

My experience is you are much more likely to encounter a fake B/C than a D over. Girls use implants to enhance their flat chest rather than making a big pair bigger.

im assuming u haven't seen that many titties in your lifetime! fakes ones usually hard, and erect while lying down, also, they don't have much movement when walking/running.

i usually just flat out ask, "how much did those cost, and where did you get them done, they look marvelous!??"

It is not hard at all if you feel them.  Honestly, all natural breasts are pretty soft.  All enhanced breasts, whether saline of textured gel, are much firmer.

that means you got to shag her hard, let's name it the shag test!

In terms of hardness though, Asian breast tend to be firmer and more compact than western ones, so it may be harder. But I think the very distinct outline / edge of an implant really gives it away.

Real breasts have more elastic tissue to support them so bounce much more. They also bounce more naturally too, as opposed to just shifting around.

What's more disappointing is finding that a girl has a fantastic push-up bra lol fawk...

I answered this question once in the Hong Kong section.

You guys all mention some of the obvious tells, but a pair of very good fakes are very difficult to detect.

Some of the tells, are not reliable.  IE. movement of the boobs, can be fake or real, it's not a good determinate.  Excessive movement can simply mean that her breast tissue isn't very dense (can be natural) or that her implants were placed over the muscle and not fixed onto the tissue.

A very obvious one would be irregular shapes on the underside and edges of the boobs.  If she has some edges on her boobs, that's a definite fake.

Soft can mean a great job, or naturals.  Fakes are often firm/hard, but a young girl with dense tissue will also be this way.  Frankly speaking, some of the young girls with dense material have great boobs, very impressive.

I think that real or fake, it tastes the same.

However, one of the big drawbacks of fakes is that girls seem to be quite desensitized to touch, so they usually ask you to really squeeze them, which sometimes I find unnatural to do.

If you can't tell the difference then it makes no difference.

The hardness in an enhanced tit is caused by capsular contraction and it rarely happens immediately after surgery, so a girl could go a year or two with a nice, natural feeling pair of bolt-ons only to have them harden up in year 2 or 3 as more and more scar tissue forms and squeezes the implant into an oddly shaped ball protruding unnaturally from her chest.  Bummer.  Some of the WGs I've seen over a 5 year period have had this happen.  I remember one in particular that got her new boobies and I was shocked the first year how natural they were.  I thought it was the magic of the surgeon, but she told me she'd actually had them done, at a discount, in the plastic surgery training program for interns/residents in one of the local hospitals in California.  I was absolutely amazed they were such nice looking tits.

Well, anyway, flash forward 3 years or so and they are still not ugly, but they're clearly a pair of store-bought titties: hard, round and sitting somewhat unnaturally on her chest.

I've seen estimates floating around the web that the incidence of capsular contraction is somewhere between 10-50%, which is such a wide range as to be ridiculous and says something about the rigorousness (or lack thereof) of plastic surgery as medicine.  I think one researcher, also lamenting this uselessly wide range, said that perhaps it could be interpreted as a 50% incidence of level 1 (the least hard) or higher capsular contraction, and 10% of level 4 (the hardest and weirdest looking).

There is a new technique being pioneered in the U.K. where they use stem cells and body fat to inject.  Apparently the new cells do take and develop their own blood flow and therefore survive.  It's still early in thetrials, but this 'all natural' technique does appear to be good for an additional cup size . . . y'know . . . just in case any of you guys are in the market for some man-boobies.

You've been reading too many sources on the Internet =p

Rate of capsular contraction is nowhere near 50% with a properly done procedure.  You are looking closer to 5-7% incidence, but one thing to note is that in general, breast implants are not forever, so those things really need maintenance, and sometimes, you'll have to tear them down and rebuild.

Hardness often occurs with saline implants, where they are filled to max capacity.  This makes them very firm and hard, something you see in those American porn movies.  This is done because it is safer to max fill than to partially fill, which is why Japanese girls seem to have such nice implants.

I'm not really sure what the stem cell trials are trying to do, as mixing stem cells and body fat just don't make much sense.  The body would flush out the body fat via circulation, while the stem cells are being used to replace what, fat cells?  That's a lot of stem cells you'll have to inject and doesn't seem very viable.  I've not seen the research, so it's interesting but it does not sound very safe.

The doctors at the clinic I co-own don't give that option much credibility.

I dont know about you guys but does it really matter if they are real or fake? breasts are breasts..
but if you really want a technique..

Just go up to the girl, and grab her boobs.. then say how amazing her natural tits are...
if she says they aren't natural, then you'll have your answer
if you get slapped, then you know they are real.

I might be alone in this, but I love fake boobs. The way they are perfectly shaped when she is standing and how they "fight back" when you grab them. It makes me horny just thinking about it.

Either way if there are fake or real,  you are going to get slapped or punched. Next thing maybe getting an assault changed against you.

Grabbing and squeezing the tomatoes is one of my favorite thing to do when having sex .....In some places they even let you grab and squeeze the goods for a sample  

[ Last edited by  Weelock at 17-2-2010 16:26 ]

Use a long sharp probe....

I can't say I have a huge amount of experience, but I seriously cannot imagine failing to recognise a fake pair after having a decent feel.  Every fake pair I have had experience with (maybe about 7-8), have been unusually firm, or the implant itself, has been easily distinguishable from the underlying natural breast tissue.

That's what I've noticed as well - especially in go-go's where I live.

Alan