With AMPs constantly rotating out WG, it’s best to share with MMS good and bad experiences imo…

But, what about orgs in general with somewhat static line-ups?

I’m curious to know whether you’d share with the PO, if or if they don’t ask, that you had a bad experience.

What sparked this question is reading mixed reviews from mongers for one specific WG. Even repeats were mixed..

I would hate to get blacklisted from an org by telling PO I had a not so great time with so and so,, or photos are PS’d, etc.

Your Post Had 2-3 terms I didn't recognize, but I think your argument was there should be more posts on both sides of the fence for experiences. I agree


While YMMV and girls rotate, trends of which agents tend to do better and services offered in stable do emerge over time. Just positive reviews are useless. The negative ones help Put in guardrails. I'm sure they see many and keeps an equilibrium. Maybe chatgpt can produce a summary of how data improves markets....

My opinion on Bay Area K-Orgs with a more static line-up - I have a lot less experience with C-Orgs.  I think if the PO wants feedback, they will ask for it. Outside of that, the primary mechanism for communicating criticism is through reviews and whether you repeat or not.

The only PO that has consistently asked for feedback when I see a new girl is the LSC PO. I've also been asked by the Cara's Angels PO when I was brand new. She also throws in comments like XYZ girl enjoyed your visit. Nice touch, I assume just a courtesy to make you feel good about repeating. Kind of common sense, if you are a regular patron who spends significant $$$ at an org, I'd expect them to be much more receptive to feedback, particularly criticism or constructive feedback.

The other thing, unless I really feel like I have good rapport with a PO, I'm careful about how I deliver any feedback. Tonality matters and it is easy to be misunderstood in a short text message, especially if it is English as a second language. There are certain POs I know are more challenging to deal with or strictly business. Even with LSC, if I have a session that wasn't the greatest and the PO asks about it, I lead with a positive, tell the PO the girl wasn't as good as my favorites at the Org XYZ girl, and then offer one or two points of less explicit feedback like "more kissing and cuddling would be great" , "a little less time in the shower", or "didn't connect well with her" etc. I did once tell the PO 'a little less teeth' implying that the BBBJ was toothy, but dancing around it to avoid saying I got a blowjob in a text message. I'm a softy though, so most of my feedback focuses on positive qualities that I would like to see more of.

In general, I don't offer unsolicited advice to a PO and I avoid anything that is sexually explicit--esp if you are new describing sex acts in a text message (or asking "what is included in GFE?") is a fast way to have a PO go completely dark on you and stop responding. If guys write detailed candid reports about their experiences, good and bad, the market will work out the rest. When I see a girl that consistently gets mixed reviews, I assume guys are okay with lower service for looks or that the girl is fine with fewer appointments. And some girls are fine with a smaller stable of repeat customers.

[ Last edited by  lonelychopstick at 14-6-2023 07:01 ]