Bros,

Intel and timely accurate intel is the best indicator of future performance.  At least, in my humble opinion.  With this in mind, before I book a girl for some P4P, it try to access and read as many associated review sites as possible.  This is necessary because not all girls are reviewed, and not all reviewers are either truthful or willing to fully relate what their experience entailed.

Here in the states there are a few quite good review sites which this author uses regularly.  The two which come to mind immediately are:

www.theeroticreview.com

www.adultfax.com

And there are many others.

If a girl is listed, and this is determined by matching names, phone numbers and ad locations, then I will always read her reviews.  The girl's location may not always be an accurate way to review someone because the WGs are known for frequently moving among alternate cities to temporarily set up shop.

Anyway I have found myself looking at the overall ratings, such as appearance and performance , and first reading those listed reviews which yielded lower scores.  Why ?  Because having had my share of negative WG experiences, it is more important to this hobbyist to try and determine what is likely wrong with this girl/session, or what that hobbyist did wrong to produce a lower rating.

It is easy to just list a girl as phenomenally beautiful, talented and provided service of an exemplary nature.  But in fact many hobbyists tend to hide the facts that things do go wrong, not wanting to fully reveal that the session was less that was expected.  Ultimately this leads to inflated review ratings which in fact are not valid.

Of course personal preferences are key details in the reviews and indicators of how the future session may occur.  If you have read my reviews on this site, it is clear I like a  slender girl who is receptive to DATY and DFK.  That may not mean anything of significance to other hobbyists.  So the full review details are valued as much as the overall ratings.

I will eventually read the higher rating reviews, but first I will always open and read the lower ratings first.  It does not hurt and I have found out more than once that this WG is probably someone not for me.

I used theeroticreview.com with pretty good success while in the U.S., I prefer that to finding them on backpage or anything, what my usual MO is to find a girl on Backpage that HAS and TER and then go from there. Always mention you found them on TER and you usually get slightly better service.

Frequency of punting seems to affect ratings.  Active pooners have more comparisons.  There are always exceptions though.  Many seasoned pooners only report on exceptional girls.

Yeah, Yazoo, that is definitely true.  In my case as well.  

I have reported/posted here a lot... but still only a tiny fraction of the amount I punted.  And the reason why (for me) is that I report for the fun of it.., the banter between bros, to tell a good tale, a weird event, or an exceptional gal, etc..  Doing a rote report about an average girl after an average (or poor) session would be boring as hell.  

Yet, I know it would still be useful for other bros.  So I am not saying my attitude is ideal for the forum.. just the way it is.

Reviews from The Erotic Review tend to be more reliable than other sites.

Another good review site is Punter Planet from australia.A

I think TER is really good, but in USA if you want to move to the more expensive punts (300USD+) using eros.com is also a very reliable option. That being said, there are still fake ads on EROS so you should always cross-reference the WGs using phone or email.

hi, i wanted to suggest two other boards.

tnaboard.com is particularly good for Washington State and Oregon.

terb.cc us good for Toronto and it has sister boards for Montreal and Vancouver (merb and perb).