I am curious of what others have to think. Would you rather have sex with a hot girl for a higher cost or multiple average girls for the same cost as the hot girl? I personally like quality over quantity. I am interested in what other people have to say about this. Let me know. Thanks.

Quality will depend on how anxious i am over the looks of a certain HOT lady. It's a must that i'll try her out once but more often i'll stick with the practical side of quantity over quality specially if those so so girls can really perform and satisfy me to the limit.

[ Last edited by  devilgodspeed at 8-7-2012 09:46 ]

As a general rule, I prefer quantity to a point. I'll take 2-3 HKD500 walk ups for 1500 vs a 2000 overnight. That being said, when the right girl is available, I won't hesitate to strike while my iron is hard! In short, I see the stunners as a reward, and the cheaper ones as a simple release.

Considering the money and amount of time spent?  I will go with quantity.  There is nothing wrong with "average" girls.

And your question is really about the cost, because what is "hot" to one person is not necessarily "hot" to another.  The easiest example of this would be spinners.  Some people really love spinners, but I can't recall any charging 2000 a visit.

So to clarify my answer, I am a cheap bastard and would rather hunt for some great mid priced girls.  I like to be pleasantly surprised by the quality of these girls.

Quality. CIM BBBJ and maybe some GFE. Quantity I can just bang a sex friend or masturbate.

If you're lucky...you can have quality AND quantity.
If you're not... you can't have either.

~UD

Depends on your terms. If quality is simply the gal's looks or are we talking about quality of the sex? I personally am into quality of the sex, as long as the provider isn't hideous I prefer that over some dead fish "beauty" who doesn't know or care what to do.
There are some terrific MILF's out there. And the quality of the sex is awesome.

Bro, if a face is what you use to judge quality, IMO, you are missing out to some extent.  Again, IMO, a great punt is when you and the WG just click, i.e. "fit."  If you don't have that, even the hottest girl will not satisfy you...and she just becomes another "quantity" factor.

I agree with the sentiments above....and i personally judge as follows:

1) minimum attractiveness quota (to each there own here)
2) GFE
3) price
4) hotness

I've tried ugly ones and can't get it up.
I've tried dead fish/starfish who are hot, might as well be blow up doll with a photo of a Victoria secret model.
I don't have unlimited funds, so $$ is important.

Hotness is the cherry on top.

for me it's a combination of things..but i think by far quality>quantity. i much rather spend more $ on an attractive girl then paying minimal for a PC. i think the overall experience. you're spending money neway right?

of course theres value...so if u find a hot one for a good price...you're in the money

I think for me the answer is the best I can afford.

Honestly, if money was no object, I'd buy the hottest sexiest girls in Hong Kong.  No doubt about that ...

... then I wake up in the morning, count the beans, and make a real choice.   
The real issue is not "who?" but "why?" ... which for me means to address the pressure buildup.  There's a minimum rate of pops I need, to avoid turning into a boorish overbearing jerk with a hair-trigger response.  I divide the $ available by that number, and I get my price level.  

Fortunately, with a little research (a surprisingly little research), it's possible to find girls with a nice body and a nice attitude who charge way below their quality.  And at that point, of course, I'm picking the best.  

I guess what all of that comes down to is that I'm not going punting because I want the satisfaction of releasing into a hotter girl than I can pull.  

Truth is I can pull hotter girls than I can afford to buy as often as I need  

Question for you. If you lived in a world where the average girl was all super model hot in quality, would you feel attracted to a less attractive girl because she is a novelty?

nudist who live in nudist colonies, find that people who wear clothes to be HOT and get much more horny when they wear clothes. So if every girl in the world was HOT and beautiful, would the selected few of not so pretty girls be idolized as being Hot? !

Is our perception of HOT based on the social brain-washing of the media?

If you had all the money in the world to do all the hot chicks- would you do a not pretty chick for the novelty of it?


AsnDragon

Interesting question

Short answer: no

Attractiveness is well researched ... there are some qualities we respond to stronger than others ... think sugar, fat, or some foodstuff your body is craving because it's deficient in a mineral or vitamin.  

Humans respond to sexual stimuli not because they are rare but because they are evolved markers of genetic and physical fitness for reproduction and therefore mating ... the magic hip-waist-bust ratio for example, clear skin, symmetrical features, and others.  All totally unconscious.  One of the more intriguing ones is smell: we respond most strongly to someone who has an immune system that is complementary to our own.  Here's an interesting wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bod ... _sexual_attraction.

My own experience is my taste gets calibrated to who is around me ... for example I'm much more comfortable with a flat face these days than I was before coming to HK ... and I'm now much less comfortable with a flabby waistline than ever before.  That's true to the extent that I actually turn down perfectly good offers from perfectly attractive gweipos, the likes of whom I've happily done in the past.  Poor dears.  

So, no, I admit I walk away from fuglies.  

So, if I lived in a world populated with super-model hot girls, I'd still be banging the most attractive, and still be feeling just as irritated that they're not all falling at my feet any time I get a stiffie!!  It's not like chocolate, I'm happy to repeat a good sexual experience over and over, and it doesn't tire.  

I will add though that I don't explicitly target the very best looking girls.  As put forward by Nash (in A Beautiful Mind) I target those who are just a little bit plain ... I find a girl who has to work a little bit at her appearance works just that little bit harder in bed also   Or to put it another way, my own calculus of hotness includes personality and attitude.  

But no, I'm not one to fuck a girl just because she's an outlier in some way.

I think we must first define "quality" before proceeding further in this discussion....

"Quality" as already seen from some posts from other Bros means quite different things.

Stunning, beautiful face but lousy body still = quality?

Average looking but body with nice tits and ass = quality?

Average in every aspect but great in bed = quality?

Super model with great looks but lousy in bed = quality?

The list of questions can go on an on....but I think my point is clear...

I come from a city where I consider the girls to be substantially less attractive than those found in HK and I don't miss those qualities one bit since moving here. A novel appearance does make a person more interesting in terms of personality/story, but I don't think it adds value to my perception of beauty.

I would rather have quality. If I want to shoot more, i would rather do it myself...

I like the way you put it. My answer would be no as well. I just thought of it, the average Asian girl is not that pretty.

Interesting, so you believe in the pheremone theory in which our distinct scent actually defines whether or not we are attracted to that person or not. I agree to this to a certain point. I had posted about the one WG who had really bad smelling vaginal odor. But I am sure that there are some guys who are attracted to that smell. It may be rare to find that guy, but I am sure that that man does exist.

But I find that with anything in life, things are only pretty based on the context in which you compare it with. In life I think we always want what we don't have.

hugh Grant is an example. He had the most beautiful girl- model for estee Lauder Elizabeth Hurley. Voted top sexiest women many years in a row. We can all agree that she is hot. 10 out of 10 guys would say she is hot. But he was caught in downtown LA picking up an ugly druggie black prostitute. How do you explain this type of behavior? He is one of the best looking and most talented man in hollywood and he is use to being with supermodels and beautiful actresses. But he chose to be with an ugly Black prostitute.

See attached pictures.

it just comes to show that anything can happen. Perhaps if you are like Hugh grant and you have slept with all of the world's most beautiful women, you might want to do a black crack-head WG. Who knows right?


AsnDragon

Hugh Grant was caught getting BJ with this druggie WG...perhaps Elizabeth Hurley does a lousy job on BJ? Or perhaps Hugh is not getting any of this from Elizabeth?

Or maybe it's the lips of the WG....LOL

... you might have found that most of the world's most beautiful women are high-maintenance, with tons of rules they expect you to respect, and long periods of emotional and physical unavailability, who demand more from their partner than they are willing to give him ...

whereas a back-street crack-whore will do just what you tell her to do when you tell her to do it, for something very affordable in exchange?  

Or?