[@sexyloser] What makes PD not punter-friendly? I like that it requires photo ID verification for providers. Not perfect against B&S ...
although i have heard the general sentiment before from others, i can only speak for myself.
first, PD reviews are worthless content-free ramblings of lapdog punters. among other problems, they lack tangible useful details.
second, PD providers are rumored to be able to delete reviews that they do not like.
third, there is no private messaging so punters have little way of communicating with each other.
fourth, the forums are all closed and require some kind of screening by unknown people to get in.
fifth, there seems to be some kind of blacklist that providers can access and which punters must just endure with no rights to review or appeal.
sixth, provider reviews disappear if the provider removes her account. this is another way for the provider to remove bad reviewws since she can just come back under a different name but her reviews do not come back with her.
for reasons not clear, very few asian providers are on PD.
PD is so punter unfriendly that I suspect it is run by a group of uptight non-gfe/non-pse providers. uptight providers are the type of provider i try to avoid. ugh, ugh, ugh. | |
