Originally posted by ergo at 13-10-2020 07:41 AM
The reviews issue is even more frustrating. Most reviews on this English forum are just whoring for points, and since they know a fantasized good field report gets more points than a report on a bad e ...
You do have to remember that "YMMV" and everybody has different tastes. Regarding Bee, I had seen a couple of positive reviews on her here after seeing her ad for a while online. However, I had never tried her because her face didn't really do it for me in the photos she posted. Granted, there is a ton of PS on photos, so who knows what is really real or not, but she just didn't have that allure. She didn't look bad, but I waited for better options. After the reports, I did consider her more, but honestly when I saw 5/5 for face, I knew that the OPs standards or tastes were different than mine.
So I would suggests taking things with a grain of salt. I don't think there are a lot of guys trying to mislead, but then again, the male ego does always want to embellish a little to make ourselves look better. But I've seen reports here and on other site with real photos of girls that guys raved about that I would expect the girl to PAY ME to have sex with her- I mean, some really ugly women.
The other factor is what a guy wants. Some guys just want a pussy to pound, some are really into anal, some are lonely so connection & conversation are more valued, some just want the prettiest or youngest face. So if one of the girls ticks that primary want in their desires, she's gonna get rated a bit higher in other categories also.
I do think one of the bigger changes from now to 6+ years ago is that there were more reports with real photos. Props to skebe and a few others who still get photos. I kinda got lazy and stopped asking, but it was great when you read a report from blazza, cass, etc., and you got a better since of what they women really looked like. |
