Reply #2 MothToAFlame's post
thanks for the links. will check them out. hopefully not too outdated! The city is changing so quickly
@stinkyfeet ahyes sorry, was so disappointed whilst writing the post I've forgotten to mention the body. I've just tried to edit the post but it says "Sorry, you are not able to edit post after 360 minutes, please return." well, not gonna wait 6 hours. so i'll explain her body here.
on the photo it says she's 165cm, but more like <160cm. Her legs look thin and long but most likely from the angle it was taken. they were kind of stubby in real life. tattas wise, could tell she didn't have much, so not much of an expectation, but her nipps were big and the small tattas were a tad saggy. She also had a belly, not that I'm any better, but I expected a 20 yo to be more toned and less flabby. more like a body of a 30+yo girl.... Not an hour glass, curvy or rectangular figure... just a flabby uninteresting shape. The image haunts my mind. Hope that helps to the boys trying to imagine the chaos that walked into my room | |
