quartz13579
|
29-5-2017 13:31 |
No one's going to mention Briffault's law?
1)Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2)Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3)A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
OP got played by Ben, she was just looking to milk his money. When she got her makeups and shit, OP became disposable. As for the PM, I have no idea what was said between the 2, but I don't like people prying into my personal business, so I understand why Crumen might be angry. | |
| stinkyfeet |
29-5-2017 14:00 |
Acceptance +5 |
That and 99% of WG have the attention span of a gnat after receiving said benefits :D |
All times are GMT+8, the time now is 23-11-2024 00:30
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.
