biardker
|
28-5-2015 23:22 |
Reply #10 MothToAFlame's post
Now there's an explanation but one that isn't detailed in the meta analysis. Along the lines of our collective guess that serodiscordant couples probably enagage in higher risk behaviours (on balance) that HIV negative couples. Lots of possible explanation but increased incidents--without more--isn't one of them.
There's a bit of politics here as well. American medical studies are often rife with political slant unfortunately. Even protected sex carries an increased risk over time. Message: continue to take HIV seriously because the trends show people are no longer taking HIV seriously in America and secondly, only God fearing abstinence can save you for sure.
Thank you Dr. Jim Bob. | |
| Caligynephiliac |
29-5-2015 09:12 |
Acceptance +1 |
What about atheist abstinence? |
All times are GMT+8, the time now is 13-11-2024 13:52
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.
