Another good reason for taking advice from a lawyer!! It is interesting that the HK Law doesn't specifically address the definition of buggery ... which means the courts would adopt the Common Law definition used in a precedent. But that is confounded by Cap 200 118M which abolishes the Common Law definition of buggery without giving a new definition of it.
and that means without further checking it's not clear if CIM is buggery or not in Hong Kong!
But it is (obviously) clear about anal sex with a girl under 21 (not 20) ... you have been warned
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.
