Reply #80 happppysex's post
Happy - there were three issues here which disturbed me.
1. Whilst I may not have previously asked for permission from the HGs to post/share the photos (as I have repeatedly said), I HAVE always asked for their permission. This was clear in the previous photos I have posted. Why suddenly would I take photos of a girl that didn't want them taken and share them? It goes against everything I have done so far since I joined this forum. Did I need the K's that badly??? I already had a 50RA - what does it matter once you get to around 40/50?
I should have been given the benefit of the doubt. As I have said time and again, I have always asked for permission to TAKE the photos of any girl whose pics I have shared. I have NEVER asked for permission to share them.
2. Goose or any other member who felt uncomfortable could always have PMed me and kept this private if he (or any other member) was questioning the validity of the pics or felt truly uncomfortable with them being shared (be it because he knew the WG or not). I'm reasonable that way - if the member could have convinced me that I was in the wrong, I would have taken them down ASAP [which as you'll note, I did do].
I didn't get that. I just got very short replies from Goose via negative Ks stating I should take the pic and that I did not have permission to post/take it. Eventually, he posted a lengthy reply in the original thread - to which I agreed. I was and have been in the wrong regarding this issue. If he'd have sent me that reply in an initial PM, then things wouldn't have 'blown over'.
What I didn't appreciate was the ganging up and branding me a liar in 'public'. This goes back to point #1. I've been on the forum for a bit now and tried my best to share info. Yes, it hasn't always been entirely 'honest' ["Hey, that photo I took of you with my cock down your throat - mind if I put that on a forum for everyone to see? You might get more customers!"] but as I have stated time and again, I HAVE ALWAYS ASKED FOR PERMISSION TO TAKE THE PHOTOS.
Why would I suddenly go against that? As someone who has been on the forum, probably not for very long in terms of time, but certainly to an extent in terms of what I have contributed, I should have been given the benefit of the doubt. I am disappointed I was not. Yes, the girl, a friend of Goose's, needed protection - but all it would have taken is a simple detailed PM!
If I do wrong again in the future on the forum, just drop me a PM and let me know with a reasonably detailed explanation what it is I have done wrong.
3. Obviously the pics/report was shared with the girl. This has been discussed in great length on the forum.
One thing I would like to point out is that once I have posted the pics, I delete them from my hardware - computer and phone. So theoretically, the chance of them being shared on a public forum with no RAs or anything are low. In that sense, the girl's identity is protected.
So yes, whilst I have shared the photos on the Internet, they are done so with appropriately high RAs on a specific forum only. Now, if the bros are true to their word, then these pics should not be re-shared anywhere else or no one without the appropriate RA should be able to see them.
So basically, the girl's identity CAN be protected if the bros are to be trusted. Are the bros to be trusted?
[ Last edited by fjackass at 16-12-2011 23:58 ] | |
