Originally posted by Rico at 16-2-2011 02:20
Am i right in saying that Full Frame cameras are more difficult use or is that just an urban myth.....
nope, 350D and 5D have 99% same controls.
so i don't see why full frame cameras are more difficult to use.
Originally posted by Rico at 16-2-2011 02:20
Are you one of those geeks that carry tripods around bro....
no, i am the kind that buys good camera, leave it at home unused, and use my mobile phone to take WG pics instead.
Originally posted by Rico at 16-2-2011 02:20
Taking shots in low light needs a minimum shutter speed of one second and all kinds of things could go wrong in that time or does the Full Frame camera doesn't need that long because it has a larger sensor....
yes, that's the beauty of full frame.
but of course, it depends on the lens too, how large the aperture is...
Originally posted by Rico at 16-2-2011 02:20
Looks as if you are the right bro to ask about " COMPOSITION"...
Any tips...
go to any photography forum, and you see 2 groups of people, forever at each other's necks.
one kind who don't believe in expensive gadgets, and feels that with their skill, even a disposable camera can take good shots, because they have good composition.
the other kind thinks that having the latest technology and most expensive camera makes their photos better.
well...
i will not judge any of them...
for me.. what's sufficient to produce good photos are....
1) any camera that's capable of taking photos in RAW format.
2) proficient in Lightroom/Photoshop/Elements
3) a calibrated monitor (calibrated printer would be even better)
composition is important, but can be learnt thru experience.
if you want tips from me..
i say "Start snapping"
by the time you have 10,000 pics in your HD, i think you are considered a pro.
if not, please throw your camera away, and just stick to punting as your hobby. |
