Originally posted by SEAJ at 5-2-2011 08:28
Ooooohhh.... here' some more Kleenex to wipe that egg off your face; don't make anymore mess now!!
And oh, the ole sleigh of hand huh?? A Hail Mary Pass!! You actually deleting your #747 (how appropriate a number - a real jet up your arse!) and posting up another replacement "informative" post huh?!
And what's this about informative - I thought that you're "Mr. Adamant this thread is so gobbledygook that no one can search for any information on it?"
Well.........it IS gobbledygook......... and endlessly long...... so YOU of all people.......bother giving info here?! Hi Joe, not sure what "egg" I have on my face or what for??? but no harm done, I don't take your egg comment seriously.
To clarify for you about the thread numbers, as I clearly mentioned in post #751 I consolidated posts #747 (my original post to Bro JJJ37) and #751 for ease of reading and to comply with consolidation requests from TD. The original post was not edited in any way when I consolidated the 2 posts so there was nothing "replacement" about it as you know since you obviously read #747. This therefore is my second response and so subject of a new post. I hope you find it sincere and friendly since that is how it's intended.
Regarding your "gobbledygook" comment, I have not used that word or similar to describe this thread so please don't suggest I have. This thread is long (you don't agree???) and it is not "as easy" to locate specific info in this thread, as it is in some more specific dedicated areas of the forum (you don't agree???). However this thread is a good place to chat and get a prompt answer to a question which is EXACTLY what happened here between JJJ37 and I. A good example of the system working well!!!
In reference to you questioning the "informative usefulness" of my post #751 to Bro JJJ37, I guess that is subjective. You say it's not useful, fair enough. However the intended recipient Bro JJJ37 says it is useful, based on his rating comment he's going to try some Mongolian Gals, so I guess that's the most important thing. Afterall... it was JJJ37 who asked the question.
I'm not sure why you felt the need to "mock" my post to JJJ37 and question my true motivation (suggesting it was to promote another thread). However my only intention was to help answer the Bro's question and provide him with a resource to experiment if he decided my reply was interesting. In any case, I'm not offended by your comment and probably over reacted when I called you a wanker in response.
If you also are left scratching your head about the appropriateness of your response, then please JOIN me in agreeing to show each other respect and professional courtesy going forward. I am keen to go that way because you clearly have knowledge and expertise in areas I don't.
In conclusion, if you refrain from telling me to "stick a real jet up my arse", I promise not to call you a WANKER. |