happyrabbit
Musky Member
Rank: 2


UID 65189
Digest Posts 0
Credits 166
Posts 50
Karma 165
Acceptance 19
Reading Access 20
Registered 10-5-2011
Location china
Status Offline
Post at 30-11-2011 22:08  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Mong Kok fire

The fire in mong kok is worrying me. I haven't been to the place to check the damage. My favorite WG is near Fa Yuen st. The mother fucker who started that fire should burn in Hell!

I haven't made a report on her. But she's the closest gfe you can get out of a local WG.
Amazing bbbjs and fks. She doesn't complain while doing 15 minute bbbjs. She's got that green look and young energy but the skills of a veteran WG. And she has this fucking sweet smile everytime I leave.

I hope she's still there. Coz I fucking forgot to get her phone number! Fml!

Ok rant over.

If any bros have info on how the walk ups on Fa Yuen and Tung Choi streets are doing please feel free to share.
Top
hkplayboy
Banned




UID 64414
Digest Posts 0
Credits 265
Posts 93
Karma 263
Acceptance 46
Reading Access 0
Registered 26-4-2011
Status Offline
Post at 30-11-2011 22:43  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I was walking around mongkok today afternoon around 4-5pm after my punt from TST, heavy traffic, loads of tv reporters, I think the casualty will be even higher overnight cos some of the residents (30+) are seriously burnt.
Top
owen10
Musky Member
Rank: 2



UID 59276
Digest Posts 0
Credits 110
Posts 105
Karma 109
Acceptance 10
Reading Access 20
Registered 21-1-2011
Status Offline
Post at 30-11-2011 23:11  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
I saw the news article even on BBC.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-15958631
Top
hotdog
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 454
Digest Posts 0
Credits 318
Posts 171
Karma 317
Acceptance 13
Reading Access 30
Registered 10-3-2007
Status Offline
Post at 30-11-2011 23:32  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
So is MongKok still a-ok to go visit? I'm mostly thinking about the area around Sino Centre and CTMA?
Top
JJJ37
Throbbing Titan
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


UID 59774
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4048
Posts 1785
Karma 3990
Acceptance 1153
Reading Access 70
Registered 30-1-2011
Location US or Thailand
Status Offline
Post at 1-12-2011 00:57  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #1 happyrabbit's post

Interesting... there is a fire and you're only worried about your BBBJ???

Recent Ratings
Petay_1283   2-12-2011 21:09  Acceptance  +2   lmao!
hunter   1-12-2011 09:18  Acceptance  +1   lol...........true. ppl are dying n we are still concern about BBJ
happyrabbit   1-12-2011 02:50  Acceptance  +1   Yes. So?
Top
JackTheBat
Forum Moderator
Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15


UID 56406
Digest Posts 0
Credits 32125
Posts 2124
Karma 31726
Acceptance 7975
Reading Access 150
Registered 1-12-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-12-2011 01:00  Profile Blog P.M. 
Font size: S M L
they had a fire in the same spot almost exactly a year ago: Dec 6 2010. fortunately no one was hurt that time. but residents have complained routinely over the last year: it's dangerous, the street stalls might catch fire, etc. no one needs to mention the obvious subtext...fires in this particular area are not likely to be accidental.

this recent fire was seen to have been started on BOTH sides of the street. sadly, people died (and this makes me ANGRY). it's on international media. the Chief Executive spoke about it publicly, in English, and announced a special task force to investigate.

i wd not go mongering in the immediate vicinity for the time being. i expect a considerable amount of LE presence, and young men with colored hair expect to be "pulled over" for ID checks. i don't know the details of such matters, but Hong Kong runs with a general expectation of reasonableness, and this is clearly not reasonable.

when such actions occur, esp with loss of innocent life (WHO would burn elderly people in their own homes?? like i said, i'm angry that such abhorrent behavior wd occur it what is normally a reasonable, peaceful place), the HKP must be seen to be taking proactive action. i don't know what's happening behind the scenes, but i hope they capture some young punks with paraffin on their fingertips or whatever.

action will be taken, and i hope everyone's favorite gal is OK and all that. but, i wd expect significant LE presence in the area for weeks or months. in general, the HKP is not unreasonable about our hobby, but in the wake of this horrific incident, the rules may shift. the destruction and loss of life is frankly intolerable...assuming this wasn't an accident.

does anyone think it's an accident?

JtB
Top
robespierre
Kinky King
Rank: 5Rank: 5



UID 46266
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1427
Posts 180
Karma 1421
Acceptance 119
Reading Access 50
Registered 9-6-2010
Status Offline
Post at 1-12-2011 01:10  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Well, from the article, they suspect it from being intentional, but I don't know as I can't see any "reason" for this. Did the fire start in the street in the different shops or in the building?

The thing is, most of the building there are quite old and not up to date with safety measures, so who knows...
Top
happyrabbit
Musky Member
Rank: 2


UID 65189
Digest Posts 0
Credits 166
Posts 50
Karma 165
Acceptance 19
Reading Access 20
Registered 10-5-2011
Location china
Status Offline
Post at 1-12-2011 02:47  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #6 JackTheBat's post

It's arson... My theory is... Someone or some group wants to redevelop parts of mong kok into a newer and bigger shopping district or residential buildings. The plan is... Burn the area repeatedly and soon enough some lawmakers will lobby for the banning of street stalls and buying out ofold buildings to make way for newer buildings(of course new owners/developers).

It just keeps me wondering as to why repeated fires and acid throwing incidents occur more on mong kok and not other parts of Hong Kong.
Top
JackTheBat
Forum Moderator
Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15


UID 56406
Digest Posts 0
Credits 32125
Posts 2124
Karma 31726
Acceptance 7975
Reading Access 150
Registered 1-12-2010
Status Offline
Post at 2-12-2011 00:19  Profile Blog P.M. 
Font size: S M L
there's history here, i won't list it all. but when the "Six Streets Area" was razed and turned into the Prosperous Gardens housing estate, that was a declaration by the HK authorities that they were in play for, shall we say, control, of that area, with, it is understood, other factions.

the LCSD (Leisure Cultural Service Dept) had little success, so after 20 years or so they formed the Urban Renewal Authority (URA). the biggest change in Mongkok has been Langham Place, which took about 15 years to build. it changed the neighborhood.

certain factions are still operating certain trades there, people say. could it be that the 141-hobby is one of them?

as for the fire, the article in today's SCMP explains some of the details as far as is currently known. i think HappyRabbit is likely on track with his comments, but what factions are doing what...i can't speculate. i do think that literally playing with fire in an area that crowded is criminal, and i can't fathom anyone who wd want to see people actually succumb in such an incident. it's ghastly. you'll note the article lists one "of the dead as a woman, Chen Xianxian, 24"...that's a mainland name, is it not. she was 24. this whole thing is just horrible:
============
Arson probe as inferno kills 9
Police investigating fire that started in hawker stalls and tore through buildings - leaving another 34 injured, including an 11-month-old baby - confirm it is being treated as suspicious
Clifford Lo, Simpson Cheung, Jennifer Ngo and Lo Wei
Dec 01, 2011        

Police investigating a suspected arson attack that left nine dead and 34 injured when fire tore through a Mong Kok street appealed to the public for information last night.

The nine bodies were found on the staircase of a building numbered 192 and 194 Fa Yuen Street.

Six of the deaths were confirmed by paramedics at the scene and the other three were declared dead in Kwong Wah Hospital.

A total of 44 fire engines and 210 firefighters were sent to tackle the blaze, with 26 ambulances called.

One of those injured in the blaze, which broke out early yesterday after hawker stalls caught fire, was an 11-month-old baby.

Anna Tsang Yim-sheung, police deputy district commander for Mong Kok, confirmed the blaze, the city's deadliest for 15 years, was being treated as suspicious.

She said: "We will consider all the clues. This is a very serious offence. We will try our best and use all our resources to investigate the crime."

Suspicions were raised when it was discovered that two booths at the opposite ends of Fa Yuen Street had caught fire simultaneously.

One police officer said inquiries also revealed there had been an argument in the street. He added: "We are investigating whether it [the argument] is linked to the arson case."

It is the second fire in Fa Yuen Street in a year. Last December, stalls caught fire leaving six injured and leading to the evacuation of 200 residents. Police last night named three of the dead as a woman, Chen Xianxian, 24, and two men, Choi Wai-ming, 51, and Ng Kui-mau, 63.

A fire officer who discovered some of the bodies said: "They were blackened, either from severe burns or because they were coated with black smoke." He said it appeared most died from smoke inhalation.

Along with the baby, 16 men and 17 women aged 20 to 75 were injured, of whom five are in critical condition.

The fire broke out at 4.40am and was under control at 11.11am. It was largely extinguished at 12.28 pm by 12 teams of firefighters equipped with breathing apparatus.

Kowloon's acting chief fire officer, Szeto Yat-san, said: "When we arrived, the fire was very serious. Over 30 residents called for help.

"We had to deploy some of the officers for a rescue operation. We needed a large number of colleagues in a short period of time, so we upgraded the fire alarm to category three and four afterwards."

He added: "We need to investigate why so many casualties were caused by the fire."

The death toll is the worst since the handover. It is exceeded only by the Garley Building fire in Jordan in 1996, which left 41 dead and 81 injured, and the January 1997 arson attack on Top One Karaoke in Tsim Sha Tsui, in which 17 died and 13 were injured. Official documents filed with the Land Registrar show that in June last year, inspectors declared that buildings in Fa Yuen Street through which the fire swept were "liable to become dangerous".

The owners were ordered to carry out repairs and maintenance by December but the records do not state if the work, on 188 and 196 Fa Yuen Street, was carried out.

Fourteen of the injured, including the baby, went to Kwong Wah Hospital, with 13 going to Queen Elizabeth Hospital and others to the Princess Margaret and Queen Mary hospitals.

Edward Leung Wai-kuen, vice-chairman of Yau Tsim Mong District Council, said poor building management had increased fire hazards in the neighbourhood, with many blocks in Fa Yuen Street lacking fire doors and security guards.

"If they had hired a guard to monitor safety, the number of deaths could have been reduced," he said.

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen expressed sadness and shock after visiting some of the injured in Kwong Wah Hospital.

He said: "Last year there was a fire in Fa Yuen Street. It was discussed in the district council.

"We have taken measures to separate the booths from the residential blocks. We have also restricted the amount of stock stored [in stalls] and expansion [of stalls].

"We have done all these things. But apparently they are not enough. We need to review these measures to prevent any similar incidents."

A government spokesman said Tsang had directed the chief secretary to lead an inter-departmental working group to co-ordinate efforts after the fire, including the provision of relief to affected families as well as actions to enhance public safety.

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong expressed sympathy to the victims' families after visiting the scene with Director of Fire Services Andy Chan Chor-kam.

Police want anyone with information to contact them on 9022 0072.

[ Last edited by  JackTheBat at 2-12-2011 00:20 ]
Top
hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .)
Fucking Legend
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


UID 2748
Digest Posts 0
Credits 16230
Posts 12435
Karma 16060
Acceptance 3408
Reading Access 100
Registered 5-8-2007
Location Pussy Paradise, Earth
Status Offline
Post at 2-12-2011 18:50  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Just received a call from a bro 5 mins ago, apparently the police is raiding all the brothels in MK.
He was deny entry to the brothel while the cops were inside sweeping....

Prolly got to do with hunting down the firestarter.....

Recent Ratings
happyrabbit   3-12-2011 21:50  Acceptance  +1   I see. FML! I'm gonna try one of these days... And a report too.




Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Top
ulebsari (Andy)
Erotic Emperor
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 2910
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2134
Posts 919
Karma 2118
Acceptance 321
Reading Access 60
Registered 18-8-2007
Location Not in HK
Status Offline
Post at 3-12-2011 02:20  Profile P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Reply #10 hunter's post

well, I believe one should stay clear of MK these days, till this fire cools down, there are plenty of other areas for mongering activities....

be safe...

Recent Ratings
happyrabbit   3-12-2011 21:53  Acceptance  +1   She's a local. Why would I be not safe?




Cheers!
Top
p_diller
Carnal Conqueror
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 14050
Digest Posts 0
Credits 241
Posts 206
Karma 240
Acceptance 29
Reading Access 30
Registered 27-8-2008
Location Hong Kong
Status Offline
Post at 5-12-2011 09:55  Profile Site P.M. 
Font size: S M L
Unfortunate part of the news is that there will be a certain amount of racial profiling that will go on in the aftermath of the fire and casualties.  Chinese press mentions two men of a certain 'ethnicity' were found to have started the fire.
Top
 


All times are GMT+8, the time now is 1-12-2024 05:18

Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0 © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.035205 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip enabled

Clear Cookies - Contact Us - 141Love
Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. 141CLUB.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, 141CLUB.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. 141CLUB.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. 141CLUB.COM reserves all the legal rights.