It seems like every attractive girl has a shitty report.

And that's a pity because many guys, including me, probably do pay attention to the reports, and if there's very negative reporting, it does dissuade some try-outs.

Anyway, in the stock market, some bank analysts have a habit of talking sh!t about some company that they would actually like to eventually own, but before doing so, they create false reports to mislead the public and when everybody punishes that stock and jumps off, that's when the sneaky bank swoops in with the opportunity to buy in much lower.  

Could the same sort of activity be happening for this game? Are bros really looking out for each other or are they trying to keep the good ones in secrecy while maybe even offering punishing reports to an otherwise pleasant experience??

Just wondering if trust/faith and verification process works well here....  

Good question.......i

As for me, I trust my instinct.......but based on experience and regular reporting bros.....I trust them. There is always some weight with the bros u know personally and with bros where we don not have personal association.

You also need to look at expectation and liking of different bros..........

Why attractove gals have negative reports? That's b;cos of the premium price bros are paying....and bros expect an above average (at least ) service provision when the notes are thicker than other WGs.

We come some bros who report on every encounters, some report on the good or bad WG, some lazy to report, some or maybe keep it to themselves and of cos there is always some fine tuning in report here and there.........so up to bros to judge each reports and the level of accuracy u want to put in...........

Stick around and thru more reports, u see through most of the bros punting behaviour/patterns and the  is up to u to have faith or trust in them/report.......

I think you need to look at the report and take it on its own merits.  There might be stuff reported negatively about a WG that doesn't matter to you, so you shouldn't disuade you.  You can always go and make up your own mind and post a positive report!

Tho it sometimes happens that a guy won't write a report on a girl he really likes so as to have her all to himself, I doubt anyone intentionally disses a great girl to throw off the competition.

As for the bad reports, keep in mind that a single report is never the TRUTH on any girl. You're never going to get an objective report from anyone, because each guy brings something different to the experience. Guys have different tastes in women, they value different things. Just as importantly, different guys are going to be treated differently by the same girl. Some guys are their own worst enemy; and frankly, I suspect some of the guys who write reports are creeps who'd never get near a pretty girl in real life and utilize the forum as a stage on which to strut and bitch. Certainly many of the comments are motivated more by a desire to impress or advance some personal philosophy than to say anything objectively useful.

Therefore, in order to judge the usefulness of a report, you have to have some idea of what kind of person the reporter is, and in an anonymous forum that means getting to know the guy through his many reports and comments. For me, there are about a half a dozen guys here whose reports I trust; and by 'trust' I mean that if they enjoyed the girl, I probably would as well.

I've never had the kind of really bad experience with a WG reported by some of the other punters, whereas other guys seem to write nothing but bad reports. If a guy reports a string of bad experiences, I tend to think he's the problem, not the girl.

That said, I always base my final decision to visit a girl solely on her pics and have rarely been disappointed. Tho it does occasionally happen that a member will report some oddity that will change my mind - Siklong's recent report of the spitter, for instance; or a report that the girl doesn't look anything like her photos - otherwise, I go with my gut reaction to her pics - the reports are secondary.

[ Last edited by  Marsupial at 23-7-2008 15:16 ]

Not actually true - read a few more and you'll find plenty of glowing ones.  Search for email for example, or SQ ... pity they've both gone ...   

Me, I ignore the opinions and look for concrete observations.  U can build up a useful picture, even given all that personal bias everyone suffers from.  For example if a reporter disses a girl for not doing bbbj I just don't care since it's not my thing, but the rest of the report can still be very valuable.  Pic / reality gap is an especially useful question, as is any indication of personality.  

The balance in reporting probably reflects that this is an open market - I've a hunch the best WGs may well never come close to an open site like this.  If they can get business just by showing up, or can persuade an obedient guy to marry her, why would they bother?  You tend to find that in other (more conventional) professions also - the top performers tend to disappear soon after they first show up.